Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A response to Nancy Pelosi's email about ending the war

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:07 PM
Original message
A response to Nancy Pelosi's email about ending the war
A friend got one of those emails from Nancy Pelosi about ending the war (shown below his response). He shared his response with a bunch of people and I think it's worth sharing. I did not write it.

-------

AN OPEN LETTER
Subject: END THE INVASION OF IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN NOW!!!


Dear Nancy,

I'm getting all of these wonderful letters from a variety of politicians that address me as William.

Yours is the latest and I'm really pleased that the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives has entered into this friendly, informal dialogue with me. I've returned the pleasantry by addressing this to you as Nancy.

Your letter states that you want to hold the "Iraqi government accountable".

Accountable for what?

Do you want to hold them accountable for the slaughter of innocents that at the last count was determined by Lancet to be more than 600,000 dead civilians and still counting?

Do you want to hold them accountable for the 100,000 to 150,000 well paid assassins, mercenaries, contract killers you voted to fund in addition to the 150,000 regulars of the United States armed forces killing machine?

Do you want to hold them accountable for the destroyed water filtration plants, for the destroyed sewage treatment plants, for the destruction of the electric generating stations and the electric supply grid and the rest of the Iraqi infrastructure?

Do you want to hold them responsible for the total destruction of the Baghdad Museum and the looting and destruction of its priceless antiquities from the ancient origins of the Earth's civilizations?

Is it your intention to "hold the Iraqi government accountable" in the stead of your own culpability, accountability, responsibility for the slaughter of innocents engendered by the invasion of Iraq?

You write, ".the President isn't listening to the American people's call to end this disastrous war".

Yet, you sponsored, debated for and voted for a bill that, according to you, "fully funded the troops on the ground" and that gave "the President every penny he requested for soldiers on the ground and more."

Now Nancy, please explain to me how you have complied with the "American people's call to end this disastrous war" by more than fully funding the President's requests to continue the invasion and occupation in Iraq?

You write that you want support for your fight "for a New Direction in Iraq" for "a plan for change in Iraq". But the American people did not ask for "a new direction", did not ask for "a plan for change". The American people's call is to end this disastrous invasion that you call a war.

You have referred to the fact that you want to hold the President "accountable" for the "failed stay-the-course strategy Iraq". Yet you voted for every nickel that has placed the American people into a historically unprecedented debt to support that strategy AND now you are boasting that you have just voted again for "every penny.and more he requested."

Even though you have referred to "the American people's call to end this disastrous war", you are just are not getting it. Or maybe you have just decided to wrap yourself around the American people's call to end the occupation in order to surreptitiously embark on some other nebulous plan of continued slaughter and mayhem under the banner of holding the puppet government of Iraq "accountable".

Cut it out Nancy! Give up the sleazy razz ma tazz. Get out of Iraq-NOW-in the same way that we got out of Vietnam ---even though you might need a few more planes and helicopters than were used in Vietnam for the 5000 diplomats you have huddled in the Baghdad compound to fight over. It's a lot cheaper to GET OUT NOW---in lives and money----than the bill you passed.

William

----------------
here's nancy's letter to which the above is a response.






Dear William,



I had hoped that President Bush would accept my offer to work together on a New Direction in Iraq and sign crucial legislation holding the Iraqi government accountable. Instead, the President chose to continue to isolate himself from Congress, the international community, and the American people by vetoing the Democratic plan for change in Iraq.

The President isn't listening to the American people's call to end this disastrous war. What further proof do they need than the timing of his veto? The President vetoed our bill that would end this war and bring our troops home the week of the fourth anniversary of his infamous "Mission Accomplished" speech that declared an end to major combat operations in Iraq. Four years after that misguided speech, the President keeps making the same mistakes in Iraq.

Our bill achieved exactly what the American people elected us to do in November 2006. It would have fully funded troops on the ground, started to bring them home responsibly, held President Bush accountable, and ensured our veterans get the treatment they deserve back home.

Congress has responded to the will of the American people. President Bush has not. The President is clinging to his failed stay-the-course strategy in Iraq, while brave servicemen and women risk their lives for his mistakes.

House and Senate Democrats offered a plan for change in Iraq that gave the President every penny he requested for soldiers on the ground and more. But it also gave him something he's tried to avoid: accountability.

President Bush may have the bully pulpit - but we have you. Close to 60,000 of you signed the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC)'s petition to the President telling him not to veto our plan. The American people are with us and the fight for a New Direction in Iraq is not over - we hope you will continue to stand with us.

We are counting on you -- and millions of Democrats across the country who are united and energized as never before -- to help build an unstoppable Democratic Majority and put a Democrat in the White House in 2008.

Thank you for your continued dedication.

Sincerely,


Nancy Pelosi
Speaker of the House of Representatives









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did William send a check with his reply? That's what really matters, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. How about a check for $0.00
that's what I would do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I told Pelosi, on the floor of the House, that she needed to impeach these bastards.
She gave me a vague kind of assurance that we needed to "look at the big picture," and all these platitudes. Maybe I should have gone off on her, screamed or something, so she would at least remember the encounter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. how about $0.02
and write IMPEACH really big in the memo line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I like that !!!! It's great! because
then they might actually deposit it and more people would end up seeing it.

how about a massive Abbie Hoffman style campaign that we all send $.02 checks to our representatives!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. I frickin' hate being condescended to.
Edited on Fri Dec-07-07 05:21 PM by sfexpat2000
Afghanistan is a fucking disaster. We've only enabled the Taliban to get a foothold in Pakistan. Great! If extremists get nukes, it will be because Bush invited them to do it and because Congress gave this policy a pass.

BushCo's policy has made the world more dangerous many times over. And I'm supposed to be excited now about what?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. k&r'd... end the war, Nance...
end it now, and stop giving chimpenfurher the money to continue this travesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. I love this. Yeah, writing her really makes a difference, doesn't it? She's bought and paid for.
<< Dear Nancy,

I'm getting all of these wonderful letters from a variety of politicians that address me as William. >>



<< Dear William,

I had hoped that President Bush would accept my offer to work together on a New Direction in Iraq and sign crucial legislation holding >>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. Her first big mistake is in her first sentence
Edited on Fri Dec-07-07 06:46 PM by Canuckistanian
"I had hoped that President Bush......."

First off, hoping for ANYTHING from Bush is a mistake. You don't HOPE for sanity from a man who exists for war and the continuation for war.

Her attitude should be "I've got to stop this bastard by whatever means necessary.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Egg-zactly! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. it's beyond a "mistake".
Edited on Sat Dec-08-07 09:47 AM by tomp
it's either purposely joining bush or it's delusional. on what possible basis could anyone expect bush to act reasonably? pelosi is either collaborating or insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R you are absolutely right
It is not Pelosi's job to hold the Iraqi government accountable, it is her job to hold our government accountable. I am sick of hearing about all these benchmarks we expect Iraqi's to meet, when we refuse to give our own government any benchmarks to meet. They expect so much out of a brand new government of a foreign nation, but they expect nothing out of the government of this nation. We want accountability from our own government, we are not in charge of what Iraq's government does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. This damn sure needs more rec's!! Come on folks....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. If I might say
:yourock:

Kick ass letter "William!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
14. It's all a shell game.
I'm convinced that the "rivalry" between each side is play-acting at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Give Harvey this man a cigar!
:thumbsup:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. In the words of the late, great Bill Hicks:
"I'll show you politics in America. Here it is, right here: 'I think the puppet on the right shares my beliefs.' 'I think the puppet on the left is more to my liking.' 'Hey, wait a minute, there's one guy holding out both puppets!'"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. Excellent response!
:applause:

And K and R!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. Nancy is right on the mark
The Iraqi government should be held accountable for their foot dragging about their responsibility for finishing the war. Pulling out some of the troops is a great way to show them we mean business. Nancy did everything she could but Bush is unreasonable.

The Iraqi government doesn't bear responsibility for the initial response to the war but they do have responsibility for what's happening now. They let militia members join security forces and carry out mass murders. They've been given billions for restoration and all the money gets stolen. If the Iraqi government provides protection for our diplomats, we won't need mercenaries.

Other countries can do things wrong too. Its not just the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockybelt Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. This doesn't need any kind of reply. Geeeez!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC