Being nice is saying the GOP presidential candidates sound ignorant

[ProSense]

To be clear, I didn't watch the debate. That's my opinion from what I've seen of them so far.

Let's hear what Republicans had to say about what they witnessed last night:

THE WACKO PARADE....The Weekly Standard's blog comments on the questioners at Wednesday's Republican debate:

So, a good night for for the lowest denominator, a bad night for the GOP. America got to see a vaguely threatening parade of gun fetishists, flat worlders, Mars Explorers, Confederate flag lovers and zombie-eyed-Bible-wavers as well as various one issue activists hammering their pet causes.

Funny! But wait. NRO publishes an email from a reader:

I was absolutely disgusted with what I saw tonight from CNN. Thousands of people submitted questions for this debate; yet, the questions they chose only served to reinforce the stereotype that the average Republican voter is a confederate-flag-waving, gun-toting, bible-brandishing conspiracy theorist! There were staggeringly few questions on National Security, and the few that were asked include some of the substanceless "gotcha" questions which were designed for no other purpose than to induce gaffes.

Is the second guy right? Did CNN load up the debate with wackos? Or is he in denial about the real face of the contemporary GOP?

You'll be unsurprised to learn that I vote for option B. If you get questions from tub thumpers, gun nuts, and tax zealots, then you air questions from tub thumpers, gun nuts, and tax zealots. But I'm biased. So I guess I'll leave it up to the wingers to fight this one out with CNN.

The choice for the next American president: A Democrat or a Wacko!

Sums it up!

[trotsky]

1. How can the "intelligent" Republicans be surprised?

They've cultivated their voting bloc by specifically appealing to these single-issue nuts, and throwing them red meat regularly to keep 'em stirred up. That's your base, folks. Don't act all embarrassed or wonder where they came from now!