Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards responds - No permanent bases in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 09:19 PM
Original message
Edwards responds - No permanent bases in Iraq
http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/11/edwards_no_permanent_bases_and_the_pols_in_washington_are_enabling_it.php

John Edwards has responded to TPM's report that the Bush Administration is planning to have permanent American military bases in Iraq:

"President Bush's announcement of new 'principles' for an agreement with the Maliki government in Iraq is further proof that despite talking about a withdrawal, Bush is planning to pursue a 'Korea-style' American occupation of Iraq for 10 years or more. Our goal in Iraq should be to get the Sunni and Shia to come to their own political solution with a diplomatic offensive, not keep propping them up with American combat troops that are already stretched too thin. We need an immediate withdrawal of 40-50,000 troops and a complete withdrawal within 9-10 months. By failing to stand up to George Bush and by proposing Iraq plans that would leave combat troops to fight missions based in Iraq, the politicians in Washington are enabling George Bush to sustain the occupation of Iraq."

Edwards was previously on the record opposing permanent bases.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaLittle Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. There goes that character thing again. Edwards HAS IT when others do not!
Edwards just keeps giving straight talk and straight answers. Over the long haul that will be tough on his opponents. Keep it up Johnny and you might just be our nominee, and in less than a year, our President. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Hillary has also opposed this
What are you talking about with Edwards being the only one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Shhhhhhh.
They're on a roll.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. I agree ! Edwards rocks!
Edited on Wed Nov-28-07 02:01 AM by saracat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. got my vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. I love it:
Edwards was previously on the record opposing permanent bases.

Do ya think the media would notice? Oh Yeah! There is a writer's strike on right now...I guess they had to pull re-runs of the Clinton/Obama show out of the vaults...

K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. KICK !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yet one more reason
why I support John Edwards.

"By failing to stand up to George Bush and by proposing Iraq plans that would leave combat troops to fight missions based in Iraq, the politicians in Washington are enabling George Bush to sustain the occupation of Iraq."

Yep.

K&R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. K & R...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Right to the point!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&R

Reday for work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. Of course he was - it was part of Kerry-Edwards campaign that media loved to ignore
Edited on Wed Nov-28-07 09:56 PM by blm
even though it was one of the most crucial points made about being able to stabilize Iraq so our troops could start leaving within 6 months of Kerry-Edwards taking office.

But - - that's not a point the media cared to dwell on is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm going to an Edwards foreign policy speech tomorrow night -
I should take notes to highlight some of his key points and report on DU tomorrow night...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Please do!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzNov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. Edwards is absolutely the one. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC