Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ass't U.S. Attorney Cowden Refuses to Testify at Vitter Hearing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
siri2k Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 02:48 PM
Original message
Ass't U.S. Attorney Cowden Refuses to Testify at Vitter Hearing
Edited on Wed Nov-21-07 02:59 PM by siri2k
CLG: Assistant U.S. Attorney Cowden Refuses to Testify at Vitter Hearing --Assistant U.S. Attorney William Cowden Refuses to Appear and Testify at November 28, 2007 'DC Madam' Hearing 21 Nov 2007 By Lori Price The so-called DC Madam, Deborah Jeane Palfrey, has requested the appearance of Assistant U. S. Attorney William Cowden to testify upon the allegations he made under oath last March in order to obtain the temporary restraining order from Judge Kessler. In response, the government has stated: "If you wish to present Mr. Cowden as a witness, you will need to subpoena him. We will oppose that subpoena."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. In other words, same old, same old.
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernsoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. More accurately: the Feds will oppose his subpoena
The burden is on the government to show the court why the subpoena should be quashed. If they can't he will have to appear or face contempt charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
siri2k Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yup! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why do they want him as a witness?
He did not witness anything himself. His allegations were based on what actual witnesses told him under oath. Whatever the attorney would say is pure hearsay and inadmissible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, the cite says this...maybe there's an aspect in there that isn't immediately apparent
Ms. Palfrey requested the appearance of Assistant U. S. Attorney William Cowden to testify upon the allegations he made under oath last March in order to obtain the temporary restraining order from Judge Kessler.....Jeane has this day filed a motion with Judge Kessler asking her to order AUSA Cowden to appear at the hearing to answer questions under oath regarding his March 19, 2007, ex-parte application to Judge Kessler.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC