Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What an environmental waste - huge water park planned for Arizona desert

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BushOut06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:05 PM
Original message
What an environmental waste - huge water park planned for Arizona desert
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8T0UV800.htm

<snip>
ambitious project is in the works: A massive new water park that would offer surf-sized waves, snorkeling, scuba diving and kayaking -- all in a bone-dry region that gets just 8 inches of rain a year.

"It's about delivering a sport that's not typically available in an urban environment," said Richard Mladick, a Mesa real-estate developer who persuaded business leaders in suburban Mesa to support the proposal called the Waveyard.
...
No citizens groups overtly opposed the project, but its water usage may raise questions in the future as the growing Phoenix areas struggles to replenish its vast aquifer. Arizona has been in a drought for a decade, and rivers that feed Phoenix and surrounding communities experienced near-record low measurements this year.

"Water is a scarce and valued commodity," said Jim Holway, associate director of the Global Institute of Sustainability at Arizona State University. Holway said the Phoenix area currently enjoys huge supplies of underground water. But it's tough to determine exactly how long communities can sustain their rate of water consumption, given that global warming may make the desert even drier.
<snip>

This seems an extravagant waste of valuable resources, bordering on criminally negligent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. It uses less water than a golf course.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. eh, as someone who doesn't like golf courses
that's not much of an argument for me.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cool. Pump Lake Michigan there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. hey, stay away!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why can't they make sand surfing more popular? Or sand snorkeling?
How many houses will they need to prevent being built to offset this water usage?

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. There's one here, too, but we get a generous 11 inches of annual rain.
I confess I'd feel a lot better about it if they'd put an inflatable building over the whole business to keep water loss from evaporation down.

Swimming pools in this city are pretty rare. They can lose two inches of water or more on a hot, dry day in late June or early July.

Even hot tubs here have solar covers for when they're not in use. Water is expensive in the desert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Apparently not expensive enough, judging from this water park.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Grass lawns, agriculture and golf
Are probably bigger wastes. It may be more environmentally sound than driving 400-500 miles to the beach or to the mountains for the same recreation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. As a kid I would have been happy to have had a community pool
Besides water that's going to require a lot of fossil fuel to operate.

What happened to our values that we have to have artificially produced waves and whitewater?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC