Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Maliki Intends to Lift Curfew in Baghdad--after 9 MONTHS. I had

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:47 PM
Original message
Maliki Intends to Lift Curfew in Baghdad--after 9 MONTHS. I had
forgotten they were under curfew. No wonder violence is down and it is so quiet. (well, at least it is some of the reason).



Maliki Intends to Lift Curfew in Baghdad
Planned Easing of Security Restrictions Reflects Recent Drop in Violence, Officials Say

By Amit R. Paley
Washington Post Foreign Service
Tuesday, November 13, 2007; Page A14

BAGHDAD, Nov. 12 -- Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki hopes to soon declare an end to a nine-month-old security plan and curfew in Baghdad because of a recent decline in violence, Iraqi officials said Monday.

Maliki expects to gradually lift the curfew, which now extends from midnight to 5 a.m., and to reopen this month 10 roads in the capital that have been shut as a security precaution, according to one of his aides. The aide cautioned that the plans could be altered depending on fast-moving conditions on the ground.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. New IED targets opening up. With 10 roads being closed, there was a lack of targets. Insurgents
Edited on Wed Nov-14-07 03:06 PM by shain from kane
were starting to complain.



Using same language as Rumsfeld.

From the internets---

JIM LEHRER: And he said "that we should consider bombing Iraq which he said had better targets. At first I thought Rumsfeld was joking, but he was serious."

DONALD RUMSFELD: How does he know? I don't think I've met this person two or three times in my life. And I did say the truth, and the truth was -- I think what I said was Afghanistan is -- someone said "are you running out of targets?" And I said "Afghanistan is running out of targets." And the reason was we needed people on the ground, and we needed to target designators that could help us with the Taliban.



Edited to add reference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC