|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 10:56 AM Original message |
If you support Hillary, How Do You Explain Her Allowing Rupert Murdock To Hold A Fundraiser for Her? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
1. I'd do the same thing.......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:18 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Would you allow racist or bigot organizations to throw you a fundraiser also? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deutsey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:33 AM Response to Reply #6 |
20. Seems to me, you'd have to be somewhat beholden to such a large contributor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:27 PM Response to Reply #6 |
42. I'd judge things on an individual basis.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:24 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Fight to Lose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:31 AM Response to Reply #1 |
16. So: Republicans supporting Hillary: OK. Republicans supporting Greens: BAD. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilith Velkor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:57 PM Response to Reply #16 |
70. Of course! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
2. great question, 1st rec.... hang on buddy, it's about to get bumpy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
3. There are two corporate political parties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:09 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Fox News spews falsehoods, inaccurate information, and has a nefarious agenda --- 'evil' in my book |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:19 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. FOX is pro-corporation. I've never heard them say anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:24 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. To Be Accurate, Fox News is a subsidiary of corp parent News Corp, controlled by Murdock... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:40 AM Response to Reply #12 |
28. Corporations get to make the rules, and get to decide how the rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
5. You've got that backwards, Murdoch is REPAYING the DLC for allowing him to aquire his monopoly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:19 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. You may be right --but in any event it REQUIRED HRC's CONSENT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:39 AM Response to Reply #5 |
27. I think you've got it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:32 PM Response to Reply #5 |
43. We keep hearing that GW Bush is so stupid. Such a moron. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
8. Oh, the responses to this should be good... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
10. The truth is a bunch of his dem employees asked him to do it and he complied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:28 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. OH MY! LOLOL I needed a good laugh, thanks! That is a good one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:31 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. You asked and that's the truth. I really don't give a flying fuck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:36 AM Response to Reply #17 |
24. I am sorry, you were serious in your response? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:56 AM Response to Reply #24 |
38. Are Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Anthony Weiner, Bob Graham, And Max Cleland Democrats? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:44 PM Response to Reply #38 |
66. Direct contribs of $2000 don't compare with a fundraiser that brings in $100k & UP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:35 AM Response to Reply #13 |
21. A Clinton supporter gave their reason to you and you dismiss it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capn Sunshine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:09 PM Response to Reply #21 |
54. I wouldn't call riotous laughter "dismissing" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deutsey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:37 AM Response to Reply #10 |
25. I'm not challenging you, but do you have a link for this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:04 PM Response to Reply #25 |
40. Someone posted the article a while back Maybe you can find it through search |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deutsey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:44 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. The only things I found were MSM articles saying Hillary went to a FOX 10-year anniversary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:39 PM Response to Reply #40 |
65. why don't you find it for us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:50 PM Response to Reply #40 |
68. I cannot find that explanation anywhere, but I DID FIND THIS... LINK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. they must have tied rupert up for this photo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 03:39 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. In your pic he reminds me of Joe Leiberman... LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #74 |
81. yes, and Joe is yet another of Hil's neocon pals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 03:47 PM Response to Reply #72 |
76. This one too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #76 |
82. are you saying Al is running? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 06:20 PM Response to Reply #82 |
85. No. So your rofl'ing was unwarranted. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:54 AM Response to Reply #10 |
37. I'd like to know why she complied. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
14. Two words: "Youthful indiscretion". Hey, it worked for Bush! (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
15. Has Murdock held a fundraiser for any other Democratic Presidential Candidate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
18. Looks around for Clinton Murdoch Fundraiser Defenders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
19. I guess there are no Hillary supporters out there who can explain this? Silence...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpeale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:36 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. ::crickets chirping:: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:36 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Obviously, you can't handle the truth, but keep searching until |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:41 AM Response to Reply #23 |
30. I think I made a factual assertion that you cannot deny. I asked why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:38 AM Response to Reply #19 |
26. Out of curiously |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:45 AM Response to Reply #26 |
31. Well I am sure we could involve other Dem Candidates, but let's focus here til we get an answer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:51 AM Response to Reply #31 |
34. I see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:53 AM Response to Reply #34 |
36. I'd be glad to discuss other candidates if we could get an answer to this one first... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:40 AM Response to Reply #19 |
29. If you think about it, no one knows why. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:50 AM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Don't you think Hillary has an obligation to Dems to explain why she consented? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:59 AM Response to Reply #33 |
39. No. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:03 PM Response to Reply #33 |
52. Does John Edwards owe an explanation for accepting contributions from a couple of Fox News |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:11 PM Response to Reply #52 |
57. I was not aware that a couple of Fox News employees threw a fundraiser for Edwards...LINK PLEASE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:15 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. I wasn't aware that Murdoch threw a fundraiser for Clinton's presidential campaign. LINK PLEASE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:30 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. See Link at post #62. WHere is the link to the fundraiser thrown for Edwards? Link PLEASE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
32. the fact that Roop is donating worries me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
35. He's Also Given To Max Cleland, John Kerry, And Ted Kennedy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:15 PM Response to Reply #35 |
46. Hey hey HEY! No facts here, bucko! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:51 PM Response to Reply #35 |
50. The contributions you identified were non-Presidential 1999 - 2001, $2000 or LESS EACH.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:02 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. uhh...the fundraising event you're harping on also was non-presidential |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:10 PM Response to Reply #51 |
56. Getting tired of you people and your fancy facts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:28 PM Response to Reply #51 |
62. She was collecting money for her Presidential Run in 2008... LINK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
41. Same reason it's okay for her to get support by religious bigots. IOKIYAHRC. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElizabethDC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
44. Murdoch held a fundraiser for her Senate race. He's not supporting her for President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:35 PM Response to Reply #44 |
64. That is a canard. She collected the money for her 2008 Presidential Run ... LINK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gold Metal Flake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
45. There is an innocent explaination.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
47. If you support DU, how do you explain them allowing advertizing from an anti-Michael Moore site? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yuugal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
48. It makes perfect sense to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
53. I Support Rupert Murdoch... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:10 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. LOL Just shows those who intend evil sometimes screw up ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:44 PM Response to Reply #55 |
67. Some of the Most Biting Anti-Bush Satire... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. There is a HUGE Difference between small 'hard money' contributions and throwing Fundraisers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 03:07 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. I'm Keeping an Open Mind... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. OK here is the difference..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 03:44 PM Response to Reply #73 |
75. I Like Edwards' Campaign Finance Stance... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 03:52 PM Response to Reply #75 |
77. Everyone knows that there will be no change in D.C. unless we move to public financing of elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 03:59 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. I Won't Relish the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 04:07 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. Those comments have already been made by lower level campaign officials... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 04:21 PM Response to Reply #80 |
83. I Think His Senate Race List... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
59. Who is Rupert Murdock? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiphopnation (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
60. she's an adroit politician |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
61. i don't support hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark E. Smith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
78. I have an answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 06:26 PM Response to Reply #78 |
86. You're pretty smart. I don't even understand what needs to be explained |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
84. Money is the mother's milk of politics. How do you explain that? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 02:11 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC