Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Container ship hits Bay Bridge tower

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 03:26 PM
Original message
Container ship hits Bay Bridge tower


The Cosco Busan sits idle as inspections take place. The Hanjin container ship that struck the Bay Bridge tower sits off of Treasure island as a Coast Guard vessel inspects the large section of the ship that came in contact with the tower. Chronicle photo by Michael Macor



Officials aboard a pilot boat move in for a close inspection of a Bay Bridge tower that was apparently hit by a 900-foot freighter passing under the bridge in heavy fog in San Francisco on Wednesday. Chronicle photo by Paul Chinn


Michael Taylor, Carl Nolte,Jonathan Curiel, Chronicle Staff Writers
Wednesday, November 7, 2007

(11-07) 12:15 PST SAN FRANCISCO - A container ship bound for South Korea in thick fog struck a tower base of the west span of the Bay Bridge this morning, but Coast Guard officials said the incident was not serious enough to close the bridge.

Lt. Anya Hunter said the ship hit the protective rubber tires that cover the concrete base of the second tower west of Yerba Buena Island about 8:30 a.m. and then bounced off. The ship, a German-flagged vessel named the Cosco Busan that is 810 feet long, apparently hit the base hard enough for the concrete to inflict a gash 10 feet above the water line and about 160 feet long, witnesses said.

The Coast Guard said fuel leaked from the vessel for about half an hour before the Cosco Busan's crew managed to close off the damaged tank and transfer fuel to an undamaged part of the ship.
There were no reports of injuries.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/11/07/BAH3T81G7.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep
Edited on Wed Nov-07-07 03:48 PM by Turbineguy
That's where the wing tanks are that carry the fuel. Lucky break if they were not full of fuel.

More info on vessel:

http://nautik4ever.com/ships/info/000058.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You mean the bunker fuel?
I'm currently doing some research into cargo and oil carriers. I'm still naive about this stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Bunker fuel
Edited on Wed Nov-07-07 03:56 PM by Turbineguy
This is residual fuel. On containerships fuel is carried in wingtanks on the both sides of the vessel. This is otherwise empty space outside of the holds. Double bottoms are used for water ballast. In this case it appears that the forward fuel tanks that were breached were empty. I'm guessing 2 tanks were opened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Interesting. I didn't know that the ballist was in the bottom.
Have you worked on a tanker or cargo ship?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why do you hate Amurika?
There you go, giving the terraists ideas again...

JK, that sucks, I am glad no one was hurt and that other than fuel leakage, there seems to be no impact. They better check that bridge well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Used to be known as the Exxon Valdez. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. I thought you meant the "real" bay bridge in Maryland
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I thought the real Bay Bridge was in Virginia...
or is it Tampa? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Nothing outside of California is real.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. If California is "reality" then
give me fantasyland! :P :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. Further Update
November 7, the container ship Cosco Busan struck the San Francisco Bay Bridge span "D" at 8:30 a.m. According to a USCG press release, "the vessel was south bound towards Anchorage 9 with a pilot onboard at the time of the allision." Reportedly, the ship was damaged on the forward left side and bunker fuel leaked from it. When MarEx went online, numerous beaches in the area had been closed (see the USCG press release here for more details) for "public health concerns" over the estimated 58,000 gallons of leaked bunker fuel, 8,000 gallons of which had been recovered as of 8:30 p.m. on the day of the accident. Soon after the incident, the vessel was moved to Anchorage 9 on its own power, leaking oil as it went, and San Francisco police and the USCG enforced a 100-foot safety zone around the fuel in the water. Though USCG pollution investigators and marine inspectors from Sector San Francisco have just begun investigating the cause of the incident, which will entail drug and alcohol testing the crew, it has been reported that "visibility was limited" due to fog when the accident occurred.

Check USCG San Francisco Web Site, www.uscgsanfrancisco.com, for the latest news on the investigation. USCG San Francisco recently released photos of the Cosco Busan as well.

This info copied from the MarEx newsletter Nov 8.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC