NY Times Editorial: "Not Supporting Our Troops."

muntrv

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Feb-15-07 07:08 PM
Original message

NY Times Editorial: "Not Supporting Our Troops."

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/15/opinion/15thur1.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin

Next time you hear a wingnut saying "you don't support the troops," wave this in his/her face.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

indepat

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Feb-15-07 07:35 PM
Response to Original message

1. Has not up-to-date armor been given the priority the administration thinks it deserves?

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

damntexdem

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Feb-15-07 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #1

2. Why, yes, of course:

it has been fully given the priority that the WH believes it deserves. That's why the troops don't have it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:53 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.