Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Condi Rice Subpoena OK'ed by Federal Judge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:50 PM
Original message
Condi Rice Subpoena OK'ed by Federal Judge
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 02:15 PM by CorpGovActivist
Just now breaking. Will update with link shortly.

Google News should be flooded with links soon (edited link, which is now showing up some reports): http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&ie=UTF-8&q=rice+subpoena&scoring=d

MSNBC has it as its breaking news banner, with no story yet: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/

An exciting time to be living in Alexandria, so close to the US District Court that keeps on giving us new insights into the Bush Administration's tactics.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. How are you, Dave? Long time, no see! And this sounds like
excellent news! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Hey Babylonsister!
Nice to see you!

I think Condi's dreams of a Veep spot are going to go up in smoke as the well-timed investigations begin to become public.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R
Good to see you back :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is big news n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. didn't Rice already recieve a supoena that she ignored?
can't keep up with all this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. One from a Congressional Oversight Committee
although she did show up last week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yeah, maybe she will actually show up...
But then she'll just claim Mrs. Master Of The Universe powers and refuse to answer any questions. This is a road well traveled. It always leads to the same place.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Golden Raisin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Or just lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Link here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. WooHoo that will get to SCOTUS!!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. She can ignore congressional subpoenas, she'll probably ignore this one too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. I think not...
the consequences here are much more serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. No they're not.
The President will once again claim Master Of The Universe powers, and no one will do anything, and the Democrats will slither home with their tails between their legs. How many times do you have to see this movie before you figure out the plot line?

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. This is federal court, it's out of the Democrats' hands..
if anybody rolls over, it will be the SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Democrats shmemocrats. Bush is God. His new AG will affirm that.
Nothing more to it. I can't believe people still think, after all the years of this bullshit, that any member of BushCo will ever be called to account for anything. Wake up! It's NOT going to happen! Bush is not going to let his bit o' brown sugar testify. It simply isn't going to happen.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. You are a ray of sunshine Atman...
I'll just go stick my head in the oven now. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Hey, I'm sorry, but can you show me just ONCE where they complied with anything?
I mean, without simply taking the fifth or saying "I forgot?" I'd like this to be a good thing more than anyone else, but I just don't see why it's any different than every other time BushCo has told a judge or committee to piss up a rope.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hi Dave!
good to see you! Is this Sibel Edmonds territory?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Here's the latest, what I found..
http://www.contracostatimes.com/politics/ci_7352738
Rice to face subpoena in espionage case
By MATT APUZZO Associated Press Writer
Article Launched: 11/02/2007 11:45:38 AM PDT


WASHINGTON—Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and other senior intelligence officials will be subpoenaed to discuss their conversations with pro-Israel lobbyists, a federal judge ruled Friday in an espionage case.
Lawyers for two former American Israel Public Affairs Committee lobbyists facing espionage charges have subpoenaed Rice, National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley, Deputy National Security Adviser Elliott Abrams and several others to testify at their trial next year. Prosecutors had challenged the subpoenas in federal court.

Lobbyists Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman have argued that the Israeli interest group played an unofficial but sanctioned role in crafting foreign policy and that Rice and others can confirm it. If they ultimately testify in court, the trial in federal court in suburban Alexandria, Va. could offer a behind-the-scenes look at the way U.S. foreign policy is crafted.

The lobbyists are accused of receiving classified information from a now-convicted Pentagon official and relaying it to an Israeli official and the press. The information included details about the al-Qaida terror network, U.S. policy in Iran and the bombing of the Khobar Towers dormitory in Saudi Arabia, federal prosecutors said.

But defense attorneys suggested that top U.S. officials regularly used the lobbyists as a go-between as they crafted Middle East policy. If so, attorneys say, how are Rosen and Weissman supposed to know the same behavior that's

-----------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. Big news....
this fight could go on for a long time. And, whether she eventually wins or loses in court...it will be a story that keeps on giving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. Fantastic! Thanks, Dave
and it sure is good to see you posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. (Lame) Duck Season...
... tends to be a good time to post.

; )

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
17. AWESOME! Another subpeona BushCo will ignore, and the Dems will drop!
This is getting old.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. This was upheld by a federal judge n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. So what?
Bush thinks he's more powerful than federal judges, and his new AG, about to be confirmed because of a couple of spineless Democrats, will back him up. Case closed.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. It's a federal court subpeona, not Congressional...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. Pftt. Another subpoena she'll ignore. Wake me when it's an ARREST WARRANT. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. Exactly. Nothing short of an actual frog march means shit.
They laugh at our subpoenas. Judges can be reassigned, removed, threatened, whatever it takes. No one will testify about anything the regime has done. Never. Unless to lie.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redacted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. BREAKING: RICE AND OTHER SENIOR INTELLIGENCE OFFICIALS TO BE SUBPOENAED (ABC News)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
27. Wouldn't Surprise Me For Govt To Drop ALL CHARGES Rather Than Comply...
I just do not see Condi and pals being sworn and testifying under oath in a court of law.

They would not have control of the situation, the judge could order them to answer and if they did not they could be held in contempt of court. I doubt they are willing to go to jail.

Should be interesting to see how this plays out.

Thanks for the post DAVE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Funny You Should Say That...
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 02:41 PM by CorpGovActivist
... my first thought was, "Those defendants just walked."

Smart defense lawyers!

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. In my most cynical mode It almost sounds like an 'escape mode' for this Administration....
The Bush Administration never wanted these charges brought in the first place.

THis is a perfect way to derail the prosecution and blame it on the Court. They will say Rice and pals could not testify without revealing national security secrets, and therefore they had no other choice than to drop all charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. I Wouldn't Bet ...
... against that very scenario unfolding, especially if members of the public start showing up at the hearings.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Thanks for the news!
Hope all is well, Keep us posted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC