Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Diplomats Rebel Against Being Forced to Serve in Iraq ---->>>

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:14 AM
Original message
Diplomats Rebel Against Being Forced to Serve in Iraq ---->>>
Edited on Thu Nov-01-07 09:34 AM by Stephanie





http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/31/AR2007103101626.html?hpid=topnews

Envoys Resist Forced Iraq Duty
Top State Dept. Officials Face Angry Questions

Uneasy U.S. diplomats yesterday challenged senior State Department officials in unusually blunt terms over a decision to order some of them to serve at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad or risk losing their jobs.

***

Service in Iraq is "a potential death sentence," said one man who identified himself as a 46-year Foreign Service veteran. "Any other embassy in the world would be closed by now," he said to sustained applause.

Harry K. Thomas Jr., the director general of the Foreign Service, who called the meeting, responded curtly. "Okay, thanks for your comment," he said, declaring the town hall meeting over.

In notices e-mailed to Foreign Service officers around the world late Friday night, Thomas wrote that State had decided to begin "directed assignments" to fill an anticipated shortfall of 48 diplomats in Iraq next summer. Separate e-mail letters were sent to about 250 officers selected as qualified for the posts. If enough of them did not volunteer, the letters said, some would be ordered to serve there

***

The session began sedately. "We are the Foreign Service and the Civil Service of the United States of America," Thomas told them. "I am very proud of you. There is none better."

But he got quickly to the point. "We have 250 jobs to fill in the summer of '08 in Iraq," he said. "We have filled a little over 200."

***

Many in the audience appeared initially reluctant to ask questions, according to several who attended. "I assure you you're not going to be punished or placed on a list," Thomas invited.




AUDIO: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/audio/2007/10/31/AU2007103102620.html?hpid=topnews



http://news.yahoo.com/photo/071027/photos_wl_afp/909a1784473f6ac6845a882c0d04dadd



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLib at work Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now we need soldiers to do the same...
"What if they gave a war and no one came??"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sir! No Sir!
Great docu, if you haven't seen it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is HUGH. Seriesly.
They are being forced to go into a death zone wholly unprepared. It's not even as if their soldiers who knew that they were going into battle...these are DIPLOMATS who will be placed directly into the path of falling bombs. And for what? It's not as if there is any "diplomacy" going on over there! But I guess they have those fancy new digs, might as well fill 'em up. After all, BushCo promised McDonalds and Pizza Hut a certain amount of business if they'd set up shop. Won't happen without a bunch of cowering diplomats to buy their crappy food.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. It's a draft for the diplomats.
Who's next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. Not only is this an embarrassment for BushCo, but it belies the suggestion
Edited on Thu Nov-01-07 09:41 AM by wienerdoggie
that Iraq is less dangerous, no matter what the monthly death tolls say--these State Dept. folks have to know more than we do. They're envisioning mortar attacks, kidnappings, roadside bombs--they know how bad it might get, especially when the artificial security situation that the Surge created is dismantled.

edit to add: They are also afraid of the Shia retribution if/when we bomb Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. A diplomat in the article says she came home from Basra with PTSD
And could not get treatment. Amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. I guess republicans CAN and DO approve of whether they
have to serve their country....didn't bush, cheney and rove refuse to serve in Viet Nam and get away with it....guess these diplomats will also..And we will probably have a lot of Democrats drafted into these type of jobs now.

You don't think republicans would really send their own to war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. 250 diplomats required
Does any other embassy have a staff that large?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Biggest.. Embassy.. In The Wooorrrrrrllllllddd!!! (as Keith would say).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. And empty.
Perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. MSNBC is playing the audio right now.
I wonder how they got that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Listen to the audio - they are pissed.
How did this audio get out???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. K
This is kind of astounding...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC