Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I hate the idea of OnStar - MSNBC continues with the propaganda

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 08:48 AM
Original message
I hate the idea of OnStar - MSNBC continues with the propaganda
A wittle girl used the Onstar button! Saves humanity!

Here's the facts.

Once you sign up for OnStar, you lose all privacy in your car. It can be remotely accessed, without a warrant, by authorities. It can be used to turn off your car for no reason. It will spy on you forever.
How many of you will be on a mountain road, overturned, saved only be OnStar? 1 out of a million? That means that 999,999 are screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. how can it be remotely accessed without a warrant by authorities?
What causes the warrant requirement to end?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. the fine print in the contract permits two communications, ie
if the car senses a problem, they can call you, listen in, even ask you what is going on. You can waive any right that you think you have. Their contract waives your right to privacy and more.

I read of a divorce because the hubby was caught by onstar going at it with his lover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Probably part of the Patriot Act
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Onstar is a choice?
Like watching porn, you only buy it if you want it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. It's a choice now, but if it "saves" lives it will be installed like airbags or seatbelts
Under the guise of offering the consumer yet another miracle-life-saving-device these could very well be installed as standard equipment.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. If thee eye offend thee pluck it out then. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard
N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Until it's in every vehicle for safety reasons
What isn't porn these days? Yeah, there is porn porn that you have a choice to get, but how much of our lives aren't saturated with emotionally and physically distant images that we get to manipulate to our liking?

The choice eventually will be either all transportation with OnStar-ish technology, or walking. Since most people can't get through the day by walking(which is what happened when we created a world for, of, and by the motor vehicle), there isn't much choice.

Then again, why stop at OnStar for cars? Maybe walking won't even keep you from being known and seen by some emotionally and physically distant authority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Nope walking won't cut it.
see the street cameras are tracking you. Maybe some of them have you already jaywalking. best to build a bunker and not come out ever again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. If it will save me in an accident, isn't it worth it.
I'd rather be potentially spied on than dead. How can you argue with that?

(playing devils advocate on this one)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. that is the same arguement the neocons have used to push through the unPATRIOTic Act, and
the Military Commissions Act, and the Protect America act.

And the answer is NO, it is NOT worth it.

I'd rather be free to live me live rather than be spied on, thanks, though. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. That's like the "I don't wear seatbelts because I want to be able to jump!"
The fact is, it's so rare and unlikely that you'd ever need to jump from a car plummeting off a cliff that it's probably better to protect yourself from the much more real possibility of getting run off the road and hitting a tree.

Allowing yourself to be spied on just so to protect yourself from a one-in-zillion possibility is foolish, and helps bring about the overall acceptance of "Big Brotherdom." Kids today don't have any idea what "privacy" is. They've never lived in an era when our privacy was sacred. It wasn't that long ago. But now, they post pictures of themselves naked on Myspace (god bless 'em!), they carry their GPS cell phones everywhere, they get searched at school -- privacy? What the hell is that? That little four year old girl will only remember that Big Brother saved her mommy, and she'll be one more brick in the wall.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. known fact: Seatbelts prevent rapture.
so, they are dangerous after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. The example of the overturned car in a remote area IS a rarity, but
people losing their keys, having a mechanical problem, getting lost, or having some other type of emergency are sure not rare! OnStar is an OPTION! If it bothers YOU, don't subscribe! I can see it being a BIG advantage in a lot of situations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
12. Wonder how well OnStar works with the fuse yanked? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
14. Meh, it doesn't bother me. I already have a nav system and satellite radio in my car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
16. I Once Rented A Car With OnStar And Hit The Button To See If It Worked
It was neat!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
17. What if you put tin foil over the OnStar antenna?
:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SyntaxError Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Doesn't work... you have to tin foil the entire car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC