Where is Larry Flynt's bombshell? Did I miss something?

[Fridays Child]

Or is he just blowing sunshine up our skirts?

[NC_Nurse]

1. Was it that Curtis guy from Washington who resigned today?

Some sex scandal...

[Fridays Child]

3. Maybe...

But I was hoping he meant DC, when he referred to Washington.

http://bigheaddc.com/2007/10/26/larry-flynt-teases-new-huge-gop-senate-sex-scandal/

[Warpy]

6. No, he specifically mentioned a top Senator

not a state representative.

[rwheeler31]

2. Timing is important.

[tuckessee]

9. For whom? Flynt or the sake of the nation? n/t

[OHdem10]

4. Last Sunday, he said in interview with Cavuto on Fox News.

It would be sometime within next 2 weeks. He emphasized
the importance of timing. He said it involved a senator
and it would rock DC.

[laststeamtrain]

5. Well, I know it's not the Senate as Larry said but...

Condi did say that Karen Hughes' departure would leave a big hole unfilled.

Or something like that.

:evilgrin:

[Traveling_Home]

7. WARNING - Pajamas Media Alert

http://pajamasmedia.com/xpress/ronrosenbaum/2007/10/29/shocking_inside_dc_scandal_rum.php

Shocking Inside DC Scandal Rumor: A Media Ethics Dilemma
So I was down in DC this past weekend and happened to run into a well-connected media person, who told me flatly, unequivocally that “everyone knows” The LA Times was sitting on a story, all wrapped up and ready to go about what is a potentially devastating sexual scandal involving a leading Presidential candidate. “Everyone knows” meaning everyone in the DC mainstream media political reporting world. “Sitting on it” because the paper couldn’t decide the complex ethics of whether and when to run it. The way I heard it they’d had it for a while but don’t know what to do. The person who told me )not an LAT person) knows I write and didn’t say “don’t write about this”.

If it’s true, I don’t envy the LAT. I respect their hesitation, their dilemma, deciding to run or not to run it raises a lot of difficult journalism ethics questions and they’re likely to be attacked, when it comes out—the story or their suppression of the story—whatever they do.


I’ve been sensing hints that something’s going on, something’s going unspoken in certain insider coverage of the campaign (and by the way this rumor the LA Times is supposedly sitting on is one I never heard in this specific form before. By the way, t’s not the Edwards rumor, it’s something else.

And when my source said “everyone in Washington”, knows about it he means everyone in the elite Mainstream media, not just the LA Times, but everyone regularly writing about the Presdidential campaign knows about it and doesn’t know what to do with it. And I must admit it really is was juicy if true. But I don’t know if it’s true and I can’t decide if I think it’s relevant. But the fact that “everyone” in the elite media knew about it and was keeping silent about it, is, itself, news. But you can’t report the “news” without reporting the thing itself. Troubling!

MORE---

[Fridays Child]

8. I hope it's Mitt or Rudy.

[fedupfisherman]

10. Lindsey Graham?

If he's really gay I hope they out him!

That will doom him in South Carolina