Sen. Clinton vs any rightie potential nominee re: SCOTUS.

[ourbluenation]

Presuming she is the nominee, I have no problem voting for her if for no other reason than scotus appointments. In a new york minute (while holding my nose). this 3rd party talk is just nuts, peeps.

[Cass]

1. Yep, and isn't there expected to be 2 SC appointments for the

next president?

I'll vote for whoever the dem nominee is without a doubt.

[ourbluenation]

6. probably 3 and if a dem gets in then the sum total doesn't change much.

but if it's a rightie then there will be a conservative majority big time, changing this country in some dangerous ways.

[MethuenProgressive]

2. The Supremes are one of the major reasons we need to win in 08.

And the only way the GOP beats Clinton in 08 is with help from Democrats.

[ourbluenation]

7. hotdamn - you nailed it. The ONLY way the GOP wins (legitimately of course) is with help from dems..

who stay home or vote 3rd party.

[More Than A Feeling]

8. Way to preemptively fingerpoint, but three fingers would

point back at the party for nominating a candidate that inspired such a response.

[ourbluenation]

9. are ya living under a rock? there have been third party threads here all the live long day.

i didn't bring this up but I felt the need to address it so sue me.

[WilliamPitt]

3. "Sen. Clinton"

Thanks.

:toast:

[ourbluenation]

4. just read your other thread - I had the same thought recently but filed it under..

"hey, maybe it's just me".

cheers to you WP.

[Kermitt Gribble]

5. ...

:applause: