Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary kept using the term "Al-Qaida-In-Iraq". Even though Al-Qaida-In-Iraq is NOT AL QAIDA.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:36 AM
Original message
Hillary kept using the term "Al-Qaida-In-Iraq". Even though Al-Qaida-In-Iraq is NOT AL QAIDA.
did anyone else notice she was using that term?

How convenient she used that term. In exactly the same way the NeoCons use it to twist the issue and try to confuse Americans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh hell yes...you know that from all your visits to the national security
commission...damn get me an invitation. Then I'll know all the stuff you Hillary bashers post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. It isn't a SECRET, Bitwit. If you want to know what EVERYONE ELSE IN THE WORLD knows...
...about that group, no invitation is necessary.
You can just read newspapers like the rest of us.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh! You Hillary basher
It is almost as bad as saying anything about that little country that starts with an I

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Because we are @ war w/ al-Qaida-In-Iraq
Even though al Qaeda in Iraq is a result of our war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yes and thank you for pointing that out. Her attitude with regard to foreign policy
is why I cannot support her.

She has shown a consistent lack of judgment with regard to our interests abroad that ultimately effect the security of the United States, our economy, the utilization of our military and the perception of the US around the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemNoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yeah that ticked me off also!
Then she complains about "Republican frames" concerning Social Security. What will it take for some to see that she loves our aggression in the Middle East and it will continue unabated under her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC