Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Environmental Groups to Sue to Remove Suisun Bay "Mothball" Fleet (70 ww2 era ships)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 05:46 PM
Original message
Environmental Groups to Sue to Remove Suisun Bay "Mothball" Fleet (70 ww2 era ships)
Environmental Groups to Sue to Remove Suisun Bay "Mothball" Fleet

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- Some environmental groups plan to sue the federal government over a fleet of mothballed warships floating east of San Francisco Bay.

The Natural Resources Defense Council and other groups are demanding the U.S. Maritime Administration curb pollution they say the vessels are causing in regional waterways.

More than 70 ships comprise the Suisun Bay Reserve
Fleet, some dating back to World War II.

The old ships were once kept afloat in case of war, but many have fallen into disrepair.



http://www.news10.net/display_story.aspx?storyid=34483
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'll take one off their hands for five hundred bucks. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. How ya gonna get it home?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. There is zero point in them existing there anymore.
The Ghost Fleet (as locals call it) was established there because of its proximity to the Hunters Point Naval Shipyard and the Mare Island Naval Shipyards. The thinking was that in case of war, these old ships could be quickly towed into one of the two major Bay Area shipyards to be repaired. Hunters Point was closed in the 1970's, and Mare Island closed in the mid 1990's. If a naval war DID break out today and these ships were needed, they'd have to be towed to Long Beach, San Diego, or Washington for repairs. The SF Bay Area no longer has the facilities for this kind of work.

The fleet is actually still there because the Navy doesn't know what else to do with them. None of the ships are really seaworthy enough to travel over the open ocean, there are no shipbreakers in the Bay anymore who can cut them apart, and refurbishing them without a dry dock would be an absolute nightmare. Some of these ships ar HUGE, and the fleet includes the old U.S.S. Missouri battleship which many people want to preserve. Since many of these ships don't even have functional rudders anymore, they can't even be towed safely. They can only be moved using a floating drydock.

And then where do we take them? These ships are basically scrap.

Ideally, these ships should have ALL been refurbished and moved before Mare Island closed, when they could have been sailed off to other ports or sold outright. The BRAC didn't want to spend the hundreds of millions of dollars the fleet refurbishment could have cost, so they were ignored as the base was closed. Now they sit there, slated for demolition on paper and receiving only token maintenance.

I went out and kayaked around some of the ships about ten years ago. They are impressive, but even then it was apparent that few of them would ever sail again. I can only imagine their condition today after another decade of rain and little maintenance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvccd1000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Read up on the James River ghost fleet. Same story on the east coast.
Remember the huge stink when three of them were towed to the UK for dismantling, then the UK said no, we won't take em?

They are very difficult to dispose of, because we follow the law that prevents us from selling them to countries that will not follow environmentally sound practices in breaking them up. (i.e., India, where they run them aground and cut them up with torches in the water.)

Some of the east coast ships have been stripped of PCBs and other contaminants and sunk as artificial reefs.

There are often stories in the Virginia Pilot ( www.hamptonroads.com ) about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC