Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Low Morale Has U.S. Troops in Iraq Pretending to Patrol

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 11:13 AM
Original message
Low Morale Has U.S. Troops in Iraq Pretending to Patrol
New York -- Iraq war veterans now stationed at a base here in upstate New York say that morale among US soldiers in the country is so poor, many are simply parking their Humvees and pretending to be on patrol, a practice dubbed "search and avoid" missions.

Phil Aliff is an active duty soldier with the 10th Mountain Division stationed at Fort Drum. He served nearly one year in Iraq from August 2005 to July 2006, in the areas of Abu Ghraib and Fallujah, both west of Baghdad.

"Morale was incredibly low," said Aliff, adding that he joined the military because he was raised in a poor family by a single mother and had few other prospects. "Most men in my platoon in Iraq were just in from combat tours in Afghanistan."

According to Aliff, their mission was to help the Iraqi army "stand up" in the Abu Ghraib area of western Baghdad, but in fact his platoon was doing all the fighting without support from the Iraqis they were supposedly preparing to take control of the security situation.


http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/66160/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. IT'S THE LIBURRRRRRLS FAULT!!!!
IN fact I just heard this on Howdy Doody yesterday (Cavuto) - the reason we are losing in Iraq is because of Liberal News networks who want soldiers to die. And we Democrat Party types have parties every time a soldier dies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well that fits perfectly
Edited on Fri Oct-26-07 11:18 AM by Turbineguy
since republicans pretend to give a shit about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. This would keep casualties lower, as they aren't as likely to be blown up by
a roadside bomb if they're parked.

They all know the reasons given for them being there (connection to 9/11, Saddam a threat, harboring terrorists, having WMDs, etc.,) are all lies, which makes it pretty senseless that they're still there.

And we all know it's the REPUBLICANS who are KEEPING THEM THERE, in harm's way. Honestly, I don't blame them for seek and avoid. Bush and Cheney wouldn't serve their country when it was their time, why should they expect others to do so based on a lie? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. Another thread on this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. This tactic is the only thing that makes sense
No one in their right mind would want to fight for King George in a drummed up phony war that does nothing but get people killed. Bush is an asshole and all the troops know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. thats exactly what happened in Vietnam
this is now about survival

Since Congress and Bush don't care why should they
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. True... but it's gone on in all wars to some extent.
Edited on Fri Oct-26-07 12:06 PM by TahitiNut
During my tour in Viet Nam (1969), it was somewhat common knowledge that guys on lurps (LRRP - long range reconnaissance patrol) would often deliberately choose routes that avoided contact. Of course, "the best-laid plans..." and all that. It was not, however, universal or ubiquitous. Such avoidance typically happened when the force equity was foreseen as most inequitable. There wasn't a lot of eagerness to go on "suicide missions."

For my part, I often "disobeyed orders" when assigned to an advance perimeter guard role. In standing guard around critical facilities, most troops were situated in bunkers on the fortified perimeter but several would be 'planted' about 100-200 yards outside the perimeter in concealed positions with field phones at "Listening Posts". The field phones were the crank-and-squawk kind, connected to the bunker by a wire. The idea was to watch for stealthy approaching hostiles - sappers, advance patrols, etc. - and warn the guys on the perimeter that "the British are coming!" Well, the last thing we'd want is to give our position away and get a bayonet in the brain. Unfortunately, the command bunker would periodically RING the field phone to check that all was OK. It didn't take a rocket scientist to know that the noise of the field phone would just help Charlie find you. The common reaction? We'd disconnect the field phone wires ... and then apologize the next morning when we were recalled. Those were some long nights.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. What? You weren't eager to make the "Ultimate Sacrifice"?
Preferably, while waving the flag and crooning "God Bless America" to the VC?

I'm afraid that you were suffering from a bad dose of unpatriotic sanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I was pretty much an "existentialist" in those days. Sartre, et. al.


It was life at Maslov's most fundamental levels. That 3rd level was mostly back home "on the block" with Jody.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Jody got my gal :)
Where could a guy get a copy of this to hang by the bathroom mirror?

I'm only half kidding :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. Just more lies from phony soldiers.
NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. I was still driving cab around the 2006 elections
and the level of hope from troops about the new congress was palapable. Many thought they'd be home soon as soon as they stopped funding the war. I'll bet we could have kept some of those soldiers on our side and voting rolls but I truly wonder now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yet another way Iraq is Viet Nam redux.
Read John Laurence's memoirs, The Cat from Hue. On April 6, 1970, Charlie/2/7 Cav rebelled against their new company commander and refused a suicide mission down an obvious "ambush alley" in warzone C near the Cambodian border. What made this rebellion particularly effective was that it was done in the presence of a CBS News crew that was "living" with Charlie company for a documentary.

During the later years of the Viet Nam debacle, poor morale was rampant, especially in rear areas and base camps. There were many, many instances (again, late in the war) - mostly unheralded - of patrols not patrolling, LPs not listening, and other challenges to authority. US troops saw the uselessness of the ARVN (Army of S. Viet Nam) in major bug-outs like Lam Son 719 in 1971 and Quang Tri during the NVA's Easter Offensive of 1972 and said, collectively, WTF? I'm not going to die for this shit.

Now the chickens are coming home to roost for Bu$h. And in the end, if Bu$h/Cheney are not stopped immediately, it will be so much worse than Viet Nam that we will all be speechless and breathless, and Bu$h/Cheney will be cursed by all. Mark my word!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Search and Evade
Indeed, the local PAVN and NLF units even had informal agreements with many US units to avoid conflict in particular areas. This is after 1970, for the most part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. But of course, our All Volunteer Military wouldn't do anything like
those unreliable draftees did in VN, would they?

:sarcasm:

I don't know how many times i've said that the problem in VN was NOT the draftees, but the illegal war. Draftees have served well in several wars, and the Civil War (at least on the North's side) and WWII were won on the backs of draftees.

The volunteer army is not a cure all when the problem is empire building.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
29. during vietnam, much of the rebellion WAS caused by volunteers, not draftees
Edited on Sat Oct-27-07 03:18 AM by provis99
The draftees pretty much just had their one-year tour of duty, and then they were out of the military. The volunteers during the era had much longer hitches in the military, and were often lied to by their recruiting officers (nothing new there), so they wound up getting more and more pissed off the longer they were in the service. For example, much of the sabotage and mutiny carried out on American aircraft carriers during the Vietnam war was done by the long-service volunteers, not drafted sailors.

John Kerry himself is an excellent example of the volunteer, not draftee, who turned against the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. That reminds me of that scene in Apocalypse Now
of the news cameraman yelling at the soldiers "try to look like you're fighting...don't look at the camera! Go by like you're fighting!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Isn't that Full Metal Jacket?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. No, it's Apocalypse Now
They were with Colonel Kilgore as he cleaned out a beachhead. (This was before the mission where they wiped a village off the map because the area was good for surfing.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #21
31. Nope. the classic from Full Metal Jacket is the reporter asking the door gunner
"how do you shoot women and children like that?"

"easy; you just don't lead 'em as much."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. "LPs not listening" ... well, I listened ... but I "screened" my calls.
There's no telling what I'd do if, in listening, I heard/saw Charlie. Would I reconnect the field phone and crank it? (Those things are NOISY.) I rather doubt it. I'm glad I didn't have to find out. Seeing Charles from the bunker line that late February night was bad enough - when we didn't have LPs out.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=2141532&mesg_id=2141866

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. True. Anyone on an LP not listening was either asleep or crazy.
But, as you point out in your post, sometimes discretion is the better part of valor: "Lord, let me make it through this night; for another day .. another fight."

My guess is that Sir Charles was thinking, essentially, the same thing: "Lord, please don't let me find a 3-man LP tonight; I don't want no Claymore .. I don't want no fight."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Funny... I haven't thought about those LP nights for years now.
Looong nights. Sometimes solo, but more often with a buddy who'd sit back-to-back - literally taking each other's 'six' - and keeping each other awake. All night. We'd gather some brush and find a depression in the ground. If we could. Early in-country, we'd be afraid to make the slightest noise. After being jaded, we'd still lay low but might indulge in a smoke (using a poncho and steel pot to mask the glow) or stretch our legs. Crazy-making times. It's frightening to realize that some MIAs were on LPs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chomskyite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. I gotta say . . .
. . . sitting up on a late night like this one and encountering a historically-experienced human voice like yours is one of the dozens of reasons I've kept coming to DU since 2001. You have a fan in the Mississippi Delta, TahitiNut. Keep bringing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PsN2Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
24. Off topic DemoTex
But took an old friend out to the Pima County Air & Space Museum, and there as big as life is an AP-2H, the only one remaining of the four built for VietNam. I'll check on the aircraft number if you want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. "Mission Accomplished!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. So who says we didn't learn our lessons in Vietnam? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. Makes a lot of sense. Nobody wants to die for a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
27. Bush & Co. breaks the All-Volunteer Army WITHOUT a draft
" "search and avoid" missions are common "

damn.

Both the 'Guard and Regular Army are just phoning it in now in Iraq.

Command and Control is broken. They need to get the hell out.

I don't care who the next President is. People out there better not forget who truly broke our military: Bush & Co, GOP'ers, Neocons, Chickenhawks, and some Democrats who bowed-down to those aforementioned clowns over and over when it came time to talk about ending this fiasco in Iraq.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
28. Everyone needs to realize that this war was supported by no...
evidence and all of those who voted for it should be held accountable. This is one of the main reasons I am supporting Dennis Kucinich, he called it for what it was and said there was no evidence and voted against it. If you don't believe in this war and what its being fought for, you shouldn't be supporting someone who voted yes and continued to vote to fund it. The facts were there, yes we didn't see them because the main stream media didn't report the facts to us but they all saw the evidence and voted to go to war. If you are supporting a candidate that either voted for the war or voted to fund the war, YOU support the war for oil! I am so sick of all of the people that support these candidates saying how they are against the war but they support the people who enabled this war. If your candidate voted yes to the war or voted yes to funding it, then you should shut the fuck up because you are just as much to blame as they are for the deaths from this unjust war.

Please stop acting like you care, if you support these same people, you obviously don't care about the destruction of Iraq and the thousands of deaths that have come from this war. Look at the facts people, its there.Either you support those who supported the unjust war or you don't. Like I said, if you are supporting those who have supported this war, you obviously don't care about this war so you should really just shut up! I am totally against this unjust war and thats why I support Dennis Kucinich, he was the only leader that called it for what it was and spoke for the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
30. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC