Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Trillion-dollar war: Afghanistan and Iraq set to cost more than

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 12:27 PM
Original message
Trillion-dollar war: Afghanistan and Iraq set to cost more than
Vietnam and Korea

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article3090340.ece

"President George Bush will have spent more than $1 trillion on military adventures by the time he leaves office at the end of next year, more than the entire amount spent on the Korean and Vietnam wars combined.

There are also disturbing signs that Mr Bush is preparing an attack on Iran during his remaining months in office. He has demanded $46bn (£22.5bn) emergency funds from Congress by Christmas and included with it a single sentence requesting money to upgrade the B-2 "stealth" bomber.

By wrapping his request in the flag of patriotism, the President has made it very difficult even for an anti-war Congress to refuse the money. He was accompanied by the family of a dead US marine when he made the request for funds on Monday...

This weekend Vice-President Dick Cheney stepped up the rhetoric, warning of "serious consequences" if Iran refuses to stop enriching uranium and said the US would not permit it to get nuclear weapons. Iran denies that the enrichment is linked to a nuclear weapons programme and says it is entirely peaceful...

Mr Bush's request for an extra $46bn in funds by Christmas has angered Congress, but it is expected to be approved..."





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wait a minute...upgrade the B-2 bomber?
Has the American news media reported this at all? I've not heard a REASON for the extra $46B, just assumed he could get it from our complicit Congress who will deliver the money on a silver platter, with pomp and circumstance, and probably a chorus line.

And this extra is to upgrade the B-2 bomber? God, this man is a catastrophe. An utter menace to society.

And we have to learn this from the British press?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The "upgrade" involves B-2 flight training for Blackwater employees
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Pentagon: B-2 bomber to carry 30,000-lb bomb
My knowledge of weapons registers a zero :(

There are some articles, I remember reading several months ago that certain planes were being outfitted to carry larger bombs

:shrug:

http://www.chinapost.com.tw/international/2007/10/24/127964/Pentagon:-B-2.htm

"The Defense Department's new Iraq war funding request proposes upgrading the B-2 stealth bomber to carry the military's largest satellite-guided bomb capable of penetrating deeply buried bunkers.
The new 30,000-pound bomb is six times bigger than the Air Force's current 5,000-pound bunker-buster. Chicago-based Boeing Co. is developing the bomb for the Pentagon agency that researches technology to counter weapons of mass destruction. The bomb was first successfully detonated in March...

The Pentagon's proposal is one sentence in the measure seeking US$45.9 billion more for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that President George W. Bush gave to Congress Tuesday. The extra money would be on top of US$150.5 billion in previously requested war spending...

The bomb is being developed under a program started by former U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld as part of efforts to counter weapons of mass destruction.

The Bush administration highlighted the problem of what officials called "hard and deeply buried targets" in January 2002 when it released a new doctrine calling for aggressive action against suspected weapons sites, said James Russell, co- director at the Center for Contemporary Conflict at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California...

Russell said one of those suspected super-hardened facilities is Iran's uranium enrichment facility at Natanz that's said to be buried 30 to 50 feet underground "and surrounded by thick walls that make it difficult to hit."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC