Did you ever think there's no impeachment because Asshat

[Laura PourMeADrink]

may be like really sick in the brain? For some reason, this just hit me. (duh) I think it was when he said "childrens" instead of "children". If you have ever seen his governor's debate on film - he talked perfectly fine (style not content). Now all of us have probably been nervous and fouled up our words - but no matter how bad I've been at speaking - I have never, ever, said a word that didn't exist.

So, my theory is that the party leaders - Nancy and Reed - they know - and insiders do too (not Kucinich)- so they don't want to put him through an impeachment because he has some kind of brain damage or disease or something.

Whatta ya think?

[Dervill Crow]

1. All the more reason he should be removed from office.

I think he has organic brain syndrome or some kind of presenile dementia, but what do I know?

[Uben]

2. He's not sick

He's ignorant! Quit insulting the mentally ill. Anyone who uses the term "childrens" does so out of ignorance, not mental illness.

[tekisui]

3. He's a lazy drunk arrogant asshole. And possibly a demented sociopath.

IMPEACH!

Save us all.

[OffWithTheirHeads]

4. They won't impeach the bastard because his "Justice dept"

uncovered the goods on the Dem "leadership" with their illegal spying and they are blackmailing Pelosi et all. It's either that or they have been promised positions of great wealth and power when the terrorist organization known as the Bush White House declares Marshall law. What else could possibly explain why they are throwing our country under the bus?

[proud2BlibKansan]

5. He's seriously learning disabled

All the classic signs.

That's not brain damaged.

[Laura PourMeADrink]

6. i get it - but he didn't used to be like that (speech-wise) - Do you

think he got brain damaged when he fell after choking on a pretzel? That whole thing was tres weird. I think ok, I am choking up a storm on something. I'm coughing so hard I think I will fall down. I just plop down. Or maybe put my hand out or down to protect myself from being hurt. But never would I expose my face to being hurt just because I am coughing.

[proud2BlibKansan]

10. I think he has always been this way

and the stress of the job has made him appear to be less able to cope.

[Laura PourMeADrink]

11. love the pumpkins. I was just looking

at this website - out-of-sight carvings.

http://extremepumpkins.com

look at the contest winners and photo gallery

[proud2BlibKansan]

12. OMG that is hilarious!!

The trash can costume! :rofl:

http://extremepumpkins.com/trascancos.html

[Didereaux]

7. Cheney FIRST! otherwise it is Prez Cheney in fact! n/t

[Individualist]

8. No. This is why impeachment is off the table:

"The Democratic Leadership Council's agenda is indistinguishable from the Republican Neoconservative agenda," http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Kucinich_DLC_agenda_undistinguishable_from_Neocon_0813.html

Let's just look at the cold, hard facts about the DLC and its record. The DLC has pushed, among other things, the war in Iraq and "free" trade policies, using bags of corporate money to buy enough Democratic votes to help Republicans make those policies a reality. They have chastised anyone who has opposed those policies as either unpatriotic or anti-business -- even as a majority of Americans now oppose the war in Iraq, oppose the DLC's business-written trade deals, and are sick of watching America's economy sold out to the highest corporate bidder. Additionally, in brazenly Orwellian fashion, the DLC has also called its extremist agenda "centrist," even though polls show the American public opposes most of their agenda, and supports much of the progressive agenda. http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0727-32.htm

The progressive movement has not just threatened this message monopoly -- it is undoing it. Through MoveOn, the rise of popular documentaries, blogs, think tanks, etc. It's not just that we talk about real values and innovative strategies. It's because we're talking, period, that the centrists feel threatened.

Hence the DLC's vicious attempts to discredit the movement. And that's what they want. They don't seek to win an argument over policy. They seek to destroy the credibility of their opponents and restore their message monopoly. http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=721

This is why the DLC is dangerous. For all their claims of supposedly wanting to help Democrats, they employ people like Marshall Wittman who specifically try to undermine the Democratic Party, even if it means he has to publicly defecate out the most rank and easily-debunkable lies. They reguarly give credence to the right wing's agenda and its worst, most unsupportable lies. They are the real force that tries to make sure this country is a one party state and that Democrats never really challenge the Republicans in a serious way. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/why-the-dlc-is-so-dangero_b_13640.html

DLC Watch, the wicked shall not escape justice http://dlcwatch.blogspot.com

Without a doubt, the DLC is the most fundamentalist organization within the caucus, the most ideologically rigid, and the most destructive to the progressive cause.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/5/24/1712/23448

These DLC types are amazing, they really are. Their pathology is unique; they all secretly worship the guilt-by-association tactics of Lee Atwater and Karl Rove, but unlike those two, not one of them has enough balls to take being thought of as the bad guy by the general public.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/11275627/the_low_post_democrats_walk_themselves_to_the_gallows

[Laura PourMeADrink]

9. Oh I agree - DLC bad - but that doesn't explain why everyone

else,not affiliated, except a handful, are not screaming impeachment.