Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

70 punished in accidental B-52 flight

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 07:20 PM
Original message
70 punished in accidental B-52 flight
70 punished in accidental B-52 flight

WASHINGTON - The Air Force said Friday it would punish 70 airmen involved in the accidental, cross-country flight of a nuclear-armed B-52 bomber following an investigation that found widespread disregard for the rules on handling such munitions.

"There has been an erosion of adherence to weapons-handling standards at Minot Air Force Base and Barksdale Air Force Base," said Maj. Gen. Richard Newton, the Air Force deputy chief of staff for operations.

Newton was announcing the results of a six-week probe into the Aug. 29-30 incident in which the B-52 was inadvertently armed with six nuclear-tipped cruise missiles and flown from Minot in North Dakota to Barksdale in Louisiana without anyone noticing the mistake for more than a day.

The missiles were supposed to be taken to Louisiana, but the warheads were supposed to have been removed beforehand.

A main reason for the error was that crews had decided not to follow a complex schedule under which the status of the missiles is tracked while they are disarmed, loaded, moved and so on, one official said on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak on the record.

The airmen replaced the schedule with their own "informal" system, he said, though he didn't say why they did that nor how long they had been doing it their own way...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071019/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/nuclear_mistake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wain Donating Member (803 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. 70 usaf careers are over n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are any of those 70 generals or colonels?
I wonder if Dickhead Cheney had something to do with this as well?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usaftmo Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Yes, the Wing Commander at Minot AFB
The Wing Commander is the person in charge of the base, and he's a Colonel (O-6).



from active-duty Technical Sergeant (E-6)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rick Myers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. The word 'airmen' is a term for enlisted personnel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. depends on the context
within the Air Force, that is correct.

But externally, it can mean those that are members of the USAF - either officers or enlisted.

Dan
ex-Major, USAF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. 4 officers punished including
the wing commander and the base commander - probably both full colonels . . .

they should be court martialed for putting millions of people at risk . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. This sounds worse and worse.
Last I read, I think yesterday, was that 5 officers were to get fired. (why fired, aren't demotions typical?)

Now, it's 70 enlisted (airmen).

Tomorrow, the base's wild cats? "The mice made me do it," they'll say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Not for an F troop operation like this.
This is some scary shit.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Sure, but the order originated somewhere.
Edited on Fri Oct-19-07 10:20 PM by SimpleTrend
Are we to believe that some mid-level career officers decided to start WWIII? The highest rank punished, according to this, was a Col. The official story seems ludicrous.

Perhaps with the evangelical infiltration that has been reported as an issue in the AF, it makes a little more 'extreme' sense, that some fundies usurped newkular weapons protocols and were going to single handedly initiate nuclear annihilation and apocalypse, but it still seems a stretch.

I am skeptical that orders did not originate at the 'highest' levels. It 'feels' like little people are getting scapegoated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. "Fired" is civilianese
The correct military term is "relieved for cause." And...when civilian media talk about the military, they generally call Army people of whatever rank soldiers, Air Force people airmen, Navy people sailors and Marine Corps people marines.

I kinda expected the wing commander to be relieved for cause, reduced in rank and somehow removed from the Air Force--either by kicking his ass out or by busting him to major, after which he'd be sent home because no one wants a major who used to be a bird colonel on his or her staff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. ''Informal'' system means off-the-books.
That's the Bush Crime Family M.O.

The airmen are just patsies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Bush* doesn't go by the books so why should anyone else?
Fine example he sets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. THE INFORMAL SYSTEM WOULD NOT BE THOUGHT UP BY
AIRMEN.

THIS IS A SYSTEM CREATED BY THE HIGHER UP.

HOW HIGH?

JUST START GUESSING.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Enlisted personnel aren't idiots, you know.
They are perfectly capable of thinking up short-cuts. I'm not suggesting that the enlisted airmen are entirely culpable, just saying that they aren't mindless drones, dutifully doing the bidding of their masters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. I'll have some of what you're smoking, please
Enlisted people invent "informal systems" all the time. Most of them work fine.

The handling of weapons of mass destruction, however, is a place where no "informal system" should have ever been invented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. 70 scapegoats
This has Cheney-stink all over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. Enny of them been the Commander in Chief?!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. 70?!
Holy shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
17. The cover up persists
CYA, baby! It's the Air Force way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFriendlyAnarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
20. But WHY did they need to be moved if the warheads were already removed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC