Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So why is SITE beating the Department of Homeland Security and the CIA to the punch?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 05:36 PM
Original message
So why is SITE beating the Department of Homeland Security and the CIA to the punch?
http://cliffschecter.bravenewfilms.org/blog/15391-a-secret-white-house-source-or-a-propaganda-plant


A secret White House source or a propaganda plant?
by GottaLaff · Tuesday October 09, 02:04 PM



snip

When it comes to secrets and leaking them in a timely manner, this White House tops 'em all.

A small private intelligence company that monitors Islamic terrorist groups obtained a new Osama bin Laden video ahead of its official release last month, and around 10 a.m. on Sept. 7, it notified the Bush administration of its secret acquisition. It gave two senior officials access on the condition that the officials not reveal they had it until the al-Qaeda release.

Within 20 minutes, a range of intelligence agencies had begun downloading it from the company's Web site. By midafternoon that day, the video and a transcript of its audio track had been leaked from within the Bush administration to cable television news and broadcast worldwide.

The founder of SITE (Search for International Terrorist Entities), Rita Katz, says that move tipped off Al Qaeda and and "destroyed a years-long surveillance operation that the company has used to intercept and pass along secret messages, videos and advance warnings of suicide bombings from the terrorist group's communications network."

The source of the leak is a mystery. U.S. intel gathering abilities were not affected, and nobody at the White House is disputing Katz's version of events.

But privately, some intelligence officials called the incident regrettable, and one official said SITE had been "tremendously helpful" in ferreting out al-Qaeda secrets over time.

SITE has been tracking and exposing terrorist groups since 2002.

Katz said she decided to offer an advance copy of the bin Laden video to the White House without charge so officials there could prepare for its eventual release.

Of course, the White House wanted a copy, but did the White House leak it?

...several television news networks reported obtaining copies of the transcript. A copy posted around 3 p.m. on Fox News's Web site referred to SITE and included page markers identical to those used by the group. "This confirms that the U.S. government was responsible for the leak of this document," Katz wrote in an e-mail to Leiter at 5 p.m.

But here's the point:

"It is not just about getting the video first," said. "It is about having the proper methods and procedures in place to make sure that the appropriate intelligence gets to where it needs to go in the intelligence community and elsewhere in order to support ongoing counterterrorism operations."

So why is SITE beating the Department of Homeland Security and the CIA to the punch? Is the White House secretly outsourcing its intel operations? And is it for propaganda purposes?

That last one was rhetorical.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's an a.m. take on this: they shared info w/the wh, it was then
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 05:40 PM by babylonsister
released w/o authorization:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=2004045&mesg_id=2004045

As to why SITE had the video, I assumed they were working for the wh, but could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. CNN on now asking this exact same question.
'The more eyes and ears should be the focus.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. What are the purposes of the eyes and ears?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. To gather as much info as possible, according to them. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. They are the production company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Privatizing Intelligence services. Brilliant idea!!!
sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. I asked the EXACT same question this morning...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. That's the question I had. WTF?
Do we have to pay for all the private-company gathered intell. And, again, a private corporation squandering money from US taxpayers will, first and foremost, want to turn a hefty profit. Sickening, again, the BFEE never fails to turn my stomach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Another Question: "Had our own intelliegence services authenticated the Video before the leak?"
No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. So, chimpy and dickie get their intell. direct from some
private goons before the CIA and homeland check it? And, do they act on it before it's checked?



They don't care do they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Not a lick. Amazing,
Is the MSM going to put this together?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Olbermann is trying to right now. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBlix Donating Member (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Very strange indeed
126 posts) Tue Oct-09-07 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #71
SITE and an Israeli intelligence front operation in Washington, MEMRI (the Middle East Media Research Institute), are closely linked.
.
MEMRI has been responsible for mis-translating several speeches made by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad.
.
SITE's director is Rita Katz, an Iraq-born Jew who moved to Israel after her father was executed by Saddam Hussein's government for spying for the Mossad.
.
She emigrated to the United States from Israel in 1997.
.
Katz worked for the US Treasury Department in its pursuit of Muslim charity funds in the United States in Operation Green Quest and as a consultant for the FBI.
.
The main coordinator for Green Quest was the then-head of the Justice Department's Criminal Division, Michael Chertoff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. the criminals in our white house continue to shame us....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. Why is SITE beating the DHS and CIA to the punch?
Because they are too busy undermining the rights of US citizens and the US Constitution to worry about foreign intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC