Feingold-Reid Amendment to Withdraw troops NOW taking place on senate Floor

rodeodance

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:06 PM
Original message

Feingold-Reid Amendment to Withdraw troops NOW taking place on senate Floor

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

rodeodance

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message

1. D. Nelson, NK NO

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

rodeodance

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #1

2. Vitter NO

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

rodeodance

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #2

5. Ms Murkowski NO, Feinstein AYE, Colburn NO, Roberts Hutchenson NO

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

blondeatlast

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message

3. Keep this to the top--I'm going to watch the tubes, gang. nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

rodeodance

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #3

7. Conrad NO. (ealier Boxer yes, Fiengold yes).

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

rodeodance

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #7

8. Byrd AYE, CRAIG NO, CASEY NO!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

rodeodance

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #8

11. NELSON of FL NO!! Johnson NO Tester NO, Snowe NO (dems saying NO!!! damm)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

bdamomma

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:08 PM
Response to Original message

4. yes, rodeodance I was watching earlier

geez, we all know the outcome of this don't we? oh, it is getting disgusting. we are a far cry from what we used to stand for huh?...........sigh

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

rodeodance

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #4

6. Hi Alyce----I have listened with one ear. Yes Predictable. Surprized it is taken

up again. but sure am glad to see it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

bdamomma

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message

9. stupid question but why so many NO votes.

Edited on Wed Oct-03-07 01:14 PM by alyce douglas

you know this is disgusting, these Senators need to be called now, they are not listening to us.

We need a revolution.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

librechik

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #9

14. they're afraid they'll get painted as "precipitous withdrawal types

after all, June is only 9 months away!

:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Mass

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #9

21. "cutting funds"...

They are afraid to be seen as not providing funds for the troops, even if the bill does nothing like that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Beaverhausen

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:14 PM
Response to Original message

10. Does this need 60 votes?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

librechik

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #10

15. they all need 60 votes--the Pukkkes have promised to fillibuster ANYTHING

Edited on Wed Oct-03-07 01:22 PM by librechik

that walks out of committee, just to make the dems look bad.

Now you know why we fold.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

bdamomma

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message

12. everytime the repigs vote NO it is another nail in each of their coffins.

Edited on Wed Oct-03-07 01:16 PM by alyce douglas

obstructionists!!!!!!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

bdamomma

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message

13. what the hell is wrong with these people??? all NO votes

Edited on Wed Oct-03-07 01:19 PM by alyce douglas

I think the people who sponsor the amendment are voting YES

Hagel NO???????

Teddy YES

voting on party lines again those slimy repigs

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

rodeodance

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #13

16. LOts of Dems saying NO also

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

partylessinOhio

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message

17. All Dems should be voting YES. What the H is wrong here?

Landrieu NO
Dole NO (of course)

Failed! 68 to 28

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

rodeodance

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message

18. Landreu NO

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

rodeodance

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #18

19. I missed some It got only 28 votes:-(

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

librechik

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Oct-03-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #18

20. it's dead

we are so screwn

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:05 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.