Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would it be wise to forgo criticizing Iran at the present time

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:28 AM
Original message
Poll question: Would it be wise to forgo criticizing Iran at the present time
This poll is going to have a lot of hedges in.

1. I'm not saying people shouldn't have the right to criticize Iran if they choose to; people have the freedom to say whatever they want. This is rather a question of how they choose to use that right. Once you stipulate that people have the freedom to say what they want, you can get into issues of how best to use this freedom.

2. I'm not proposing any rules at DU - that's not my place.

I am just asking of leveling criticisms at Iran, it's president or its policies, is a smart thing to do now, or should we forgo?

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Every day is a good day to tell people what they may or may not say
Not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Pull!.
THats the upfront rudest response I've ever had on DU
Congratulations.

You posted a query.
I assumed you wanted varied sincere responses.
I didnt guess that you were sitting at your keyboard shooting gallery, waiting to shoot em down with insults as the responses fly in.

Your timing is pretty good, Your aim needs a little practise. Pull!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. That was fast
But let me say again - I am talking about what people should and shouldn't say, not what they can and cannot say. If yo don't see the distinction, than you are . . . well i'd better not say.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheUniverse Donating Member (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes we have the right to criticize Iran.
Edited on Wed Oct-03-07 09:33 AM by TheUniverse
We still have the 1st amendment after all. And Mahmoud and Ayatollah Jr. are both shitfucks who deserve criticism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why do some want a vote on whether to censor themselves?
If you don't want to criticize the Iranian government... don't do it.

If you want to criticize the Iranian government... go ahead and criticize.

Why would we take a poll whether criticizing the Iranian government is a good idea or not???? That is group-think taken to an excess - trying to keep some opinions quiet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. How so?
And at any rate, I've been critical of Iran myself the last few days; I'd be fine if the answer was "no, of course we should criticize Iran."

But there are a few posters here, more than few it feels like, who constantly post things like "helping cheney are we?"

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. The idea of 'helping Cheney' by posting on DU
is getting a little carried away, isn't it?

Wtf does Cheney care, or how is he affected, by what is posted on a political website?

I read the poll as saying... "Should we all agree to stifle ourselves from what we really feel about the Iranian government?"

The answer, for me, is a resounding NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. It's the Idea that any criticism of Iran
equals tacit support for an invasion or attack on Iran. That if we call them out on human rights violtations that this somehow equals "I want to bomb Iran."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I think that's insultingly condescending, NeedleCast.
I criticize Castro, Chavez, Mugabe, Bush, and others. It doesn't mean I want to invade the countries involved.

I think you give too little credit to DUers' intelligence, and to their ability to discern the difference between criticism and invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eFriendly Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. I don't believe this to be a 1st Amendment issue. . .
Edited on Wed Oct-03-07 10:06 AM by eFriendly
And quite frankly, the ones who do believe it is a 1st Amendment issue (to me) sound ignorant. I see it as toning down the rhetoric, on both sides, in order to possibly get Iran to listen to us more and maybe become more amenable to our demands that they not seek a nuclear bomb, etc. Our government calling the Iranian government terrorists every other week while trying to persuade the Iranians to not go nuclear is asinine, IMO. And it isn't going to get anywhere.

on edit: How is the problem ever going to be fixed if both sides are only interested in calling each other names?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. "Criticize" is putting it lightly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
14. Considering how we're BFF with Saudi Arabia, it is pretty fucking stupid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC