|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 09:38 PM Original message |
Poll question: Should we lower the voting age to 16? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tyedyeto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. Why? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 09:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. DK just brought it up at the debate. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tyedyeto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 10:06 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. What was his reason behind the statement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 10:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. He just threw it out there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tyedyeto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 10:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Now I'm totally confused.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. Why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
-..__... (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
4. Only if Ozzy is on the ballot! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuushew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
5. I am not opposed per say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
-..__... (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 10:09 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. I believe the defining factor is the eligible age for performing military service. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
6. Get real! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
7. Sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loser_user (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
8. They won't vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
10. Hell yes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Digit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
14. I am appalled how uniformed the general public is enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
15. No, not at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zookeeper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
16. No, but we should raise the driving age to 18. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 10:51 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
minkyboodle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 10:52 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-27-07 02:16 AM Response to Reply #16 |
26. I'd have more enthusiasm for that idea. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
minkyboodle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
18. No and I love the Kooch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
20. Absolutely ! I've always advocated lowering the age to vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-26-07 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
21. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-27-07 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
22. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-27-07 12:37 AM Response to Original message |
23. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-27-07 12:55 AM Response to Original message |
24. No, then they'll make 16 the age to draft our children. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-27-07 02:14 AM Response to Original message |
25. YES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 05:41 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC