Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Prosecutor: Deny the defendant's motion (Larry Craig)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 04:00 PM
Original message
Prosecutor: Deny the defendant's motion (Larry Craig)
Edited on Mon Sep-24-07 04:09 PM by FLDem5
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/24/377400.aspx

From NBC's Tom Lea
The prosecutor in the Larry Craig case filed a "memorandum" to the court which states:

"The essence of the defendant's motion is that the Court should allow him to withdraw his plea because he was under the strain of a newspaper investigation and purportedly relied on the arresting officer's statements relating to a potential outcome. There is nothing about the circumstances of the Defendant's plea that comes close to surpassing the high bar of 'manifest justice' that must be reached for the Defendant to be granted the rare relief of plea withdrawal. The Defendant's plea to the elements of the crime of disorderly conduct is sufficient. In addition, denial of the Defendant's motion prevents further politicking and game playing om the part of the Defendant in relation to his plea.

"The Defendant unequivocally pled guilty to the crime of disorderly conduct. The Court should deny the Defendant's motion and uphold the plea that the Defendant made to this Court."





"Sergeant Karsnia was able to observe the color of the defendant's eyes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Your link isn't working. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. thanks, fixed -I linked to the .pdf of the court document
but found an article on it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. :) K&R :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC