I just want to say - as I give up - I was looking for one number in

[Joe for Clark]

a sea of numbers. An obscure number.

You sure are not the only ones not to know - I'll say that.

Thanks anyway.

Joe

[jobycom]

1. Peace, good luck.

Sorry it wasn't here for you.

[Joe for Clark]

2. It wasn't anywhere - I looked.

[jobycom]

5. Maybe it's in a time, not a place.

Maybe you will find it further along.

[Joe for Clark]

8. It is just a number. A strange - bizzare number..

An oscillator from 20 years - more - ago. Ancient now.

It is a relationship - between public and market makers short positions.

If you know - you have a pretty good idea of what is coming - in my experience.

But it isn't there anymore.

I counted an elliot wave - it is not good. But then - I think in numbers. And I am missing a number. I know I am.

Joe

[Vilis Veritas]

18. You post brings this chart to mind.

Looks like we are currently trending back up towards a minor downward trend.



nothing really significant (we dipped earlier this year)...unless your number showed something else...

http://www.stanford.edu/group/SITE/archive/SITE_2006/Web%20Session%203/Seasholes_Paper.pdf

Just looking...Never Give Up, Joe.

Peace.

[Joe for Clark]

20. You got the 5 and the a-b-c.

You know elliot.

Joe

[Joe for Clark]

21. You know where they got it wrong in 1987 -

They got the 5 count right- and they so miscalulated the correction. That a-b-c wave.

Cost them.

Remember the correction is related to the primes - not 61.8% - just ratios.

If you understand that -

Count from the absolute - think fibonacchi -

They messed that math up - I won't.

Guys that I know that made money - they bailed the third day.


They just knew they didn't know. Smart.


Joe

[Vilis Veritas]

22. You got it Joe...I am hitting the sack...

Got an early one with the scouts...I'll be dreaming numbers tonight...

Get some rest. Goodnight Joe.

No Fear.

[Joe for Clark]

23. Good luck with the scouts..

I am trying to calculate something that may not be calculable be and I know it.

I hope you dream of naked virgins - but I know if I get it - Well, I like the game. More fun to me.

It is kinda fun. I guess.

Joe

[razors edge]

3. We all float on a sea

of unknowns, the strongest ships will still look for shelter in a storm.

[Vilis Veritas]

4. Give up?

That is not acceptable.

I only have one number. One. Never had more. I never gave up, and I do not expect you to give up, either.

Re-think and keep looking. Never Give Up.

[Joe for Clark]

6. Oh I am looking for a number that was prohibited in

print for years now.

I am not going to find it. I tried.

I was looking for something to confirm a calculation I made some time ago.


But it is all just numbers in the end - right????


Joe

[derby378]

7. I must've been occupied elsewhere...

...but please PM me so I'll have some idea of what you're talking about.

[southerncrone]

12. What are you talking about? I'm a numbers person, maybe I can help.

[Joe for Clark]

15. I guess I am a numbers guy too.

No you can't -

I can do division - I don't know the numbers - and apparently they are not available anymore.

Not on the whole - not on the basis I am looking at.

Thanks anyway -

Joe

[0rganism]

9. this one? (NYSE short interest ratio)

http://www.wallstreetcourier.com/technician/market-indicators/nyse-short-interest-ratio.htm

edit: I've been scouring your recent posts for "context"

If you're going where I think you are with this, I don't like it one bit.

[Joe for Clark]

11. No - it is a factor - 1 is zero -

IF you take all the public short sales and divide it by all the specialtist short sale s- nuetral is 1.


But say the public is short 1 share of a given index and the makers are short two - guess which way it breaks - you think they pay off your puts?????

This is a casino. Odds are never in your favor.

Joe

[Joe for Clark]

13. I didn't put that quite right. You get the point though.

You know where I think this is going I guess.

I do not give advise on stocks - not ever. Ignore the short things - pretend I said long.

Joe

[Vilis Veritas]

16. No...they play your puts against you...

They cut the vig up and play it against you. Bring it round from both sides.

Last number I saw like that was 4.567, merely a percentage, the play is win, lose or draw, house always gets their cut. Doesn't really matter if the play is short or long...they always win.

[Joe for Clark]

19. You know I think numbers - and I think there is a wave count

in effect.

Figure the way it is being played and you can play.

If 5 of 5 down - or three of 5 down - coming down -if you can get close to the top - you can win - I have seen it.

But you can bet - public is not going to be on the right side of this one.


When I know the specialists are outselling the public - I know the deal.

Been there - done that. I intend to take their money.

Cold isn't it ??-

But it is a game in the end - and the more I can take someone out on a margin call - that I know from experience is a fucking republican - the better I feel about it.

I will kick their ass from here to hell and back again.

And I won't break a sweat.

They can go to hell - and I will be happy to help them there.

Joe

[KG]

10. did you try directory assistance?

:hi:

[Joe for Clark]

14. Yeah - there are professionals that have no idea - I tried.

[Joe for Clark]

17. Thanks for looking for that number - I know you tried.

Joe

[PaganPreacher]

24. One is the loneliest number you can ever do.

Two can be as lonely as one,
It's the loneliest number since the number one.

Hope that helps.

If not, I know of a cake someone left out in the rain, which you may find beneficial.



The Pagan Preacher
I'll never have the recipe again.

[rug]

25. Deal or No Deal airs Wednesdays and Fridays at 8.

7 Central Time.