Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dan Rather's Complaint Shows CBS Collaborated With Bushco In Abu Ghraib Torture Scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:42 AM
Original message
Dan Rather's Complaint Shows CBS Collaborated With Bushco In Abu Ghraib Torture Scandal
Edited on Thu Sep-20-07 08:52 AM by kpete
CBS Collaborates in Torture

CBS imposed the unusual restrictions that the story would be aired only once, that it would not be preceded by on-air promotion, and that it would not be reference on the CBS Evening News.

by emptywheel

The most interesting thing about the Dan Rather complaint, IMO, is the description it gave of CBS and Administration attempts to spike the Abu Ghraib story.

In late April 2004, Mr. Rather, as Correspondant, and Mary Mapes, a veteran producer, broke a news story of national importance on 60 Minutes II--the abuse by American military personnel of Iraqi prisoners in the Abu Ghraib prison. The story, which included photographs of the abusive treatment of prisoners, consumer American news media for many months.

Despite the story's importance, and because of the obvious negative impact the story would have on the Bush administration with which Viacom and CBS wished to curry favor, CBS management attempted to bury it. As a general rule, senior executives of CBS News do not take a hands-on role in the editing and vetting of a story. However, CBS News President Andrew Heyward and Senior Vice President Betsy West were involved intimately in the editing and vetting process of the Abu Ghraib story. However, for weeks, they refused to grant permission to air the story, continuously insisting that it lacked sufficient substantiation. As Mr. Rather and Ms. Mapes provided each requested verification, Mr. Heyward and Ms. West continued to "raise the goalposts," insisting on additional substantiation.

Even after obtaining nearly a dozen, now notorious, photographs, which made it impossible to deny the accuracy of the story, Mr. Heyward and Ms. West continued to delay the story for an additional three weeks. This delay was, in part, occasioned by acceding to pressures brought to bear by government officials urging CBS to drop the story or at least delay it. As a part of that pressure, Mr. Rather received a personal telephone call from General Richard B. Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, urging him to delay the story.

more at:
http://thenexthurrah.typepad.com/the_next_hurrah/2007/09/cbs-collaborate.html#more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. MSM CEOs should be getting nervous about now
The beans are about to be spilled. Expect some very loud and stink farts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I expect this will be settled out of court..
they definitely don't want this going to trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
live love laugh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. Is Rather interested in money, or vindication? I don't think he'll settle. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. He has said he would donate the money to journalistic causes..
he's probably interested in both, but the legal fees will skyrocket. He'll probably take the money in the end, and if CBS gives it to him, they're pretty much admitting he has a potential case against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. never..he will never settle..he isn't doing this for the money! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #27
53. Certainly Rather doesn't need $70 million- he set that number so CBS wouldn't settle.
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
51. You are probably right, but it won't be settled until Rather has completed a lot of discovery.
It's during discovery that you get to see the documents and get to hear the testimony of witnesses. Remember Clinton's deposition in the Paula Jones matter? These guys that are named in the complaint are going to be deposed. I hope Rather has some really meticulous lawyers, the kind who learn every detail of their cases, the kind who don't leave the document production and review just to paralegals. This is going to be such a fascinating case that Rather will probably be able to get lawyers who will work for the fun of it. This case is going to be just fascinating to a good litigator. By that I mean a litigator who likes to work puzzles and find the truth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. k&r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. IMO, getting the facts correct on record is more important than the money.
Although the money symbolically is good too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. CBS-good luck burying this. Ain't gonna happen. This story has
all the elements you so love to air ad nauseum. Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. You think other networks will pounce on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. They already have. I've seen CNN and NBC/MSNBC discussing
the lawsuit. Whether they will keep up any heat is another story, but they do so love to slam sister networks, and there's a 'personality' involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Vinyl Ripper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Not in a million years...
They are all doing the exact same thing..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Brian Williams mentioned it. .
He went over the bones of the suit (did NOT mention the treatment of the Abu Ghraib story) and followed it with the CBS official response.. that it was "old news and without merit".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. MSNBC just talked about the 'bombshell lawsuit' again.
I imagine it will go away eventually, but it's just too salacious for the corp. media to ignore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Vinyl Ripper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Did they mention the Abu Ghraib portion of the story?
I doubt it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. I heard CBS report on the Rather suit last night
Edited on Thu Sep-20-07 08:50 AM by SpiralHawk
Republicon Propaganda Pixie KATIE COURIC said the suit was because Rather wanted more air time, and that CBS was pooh poohing his whole case

Sheesh: What a pack of Republicon homelander spew -- CBS is totally on THE DARK SIDE now, totally opposed to objective truth, and in massive republicon spin cycle

No
Cred

No
Honor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. NBC followed a similar path. Rather lost his '60 Minutes' gig and he aired
an unsubstantiated story against Boo$h.

He bad man. Want money for tarnished reputation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
29. CBS called Rather's allegations "old news" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
12. I hope Rather refuses to settle out of court. This case
is too important to quietly go away. Exposing the role the networks have played in covering for and propping up the Bush crime family could lead to long-needed changes - restoration of the Fairness Doctrine for starters. Go Dan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. 100% correct n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. thanks AGAIN kpete!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
17. I hope cbs is sweating in their huge
air conditioned, katie couric, promoting offices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Me too
About time somebody acted aggressively with these goons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
19. Some backstory - two earlier DU threads on the Rather suit against CBS:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
21. I think democrats all over America
although they might be friolous should start to file law suits against any negative or slanderous articles the media says or prints. We are not commies, we are not unpatriotic, we don't support terrorist and we should sue the hell out of them. Maybe they would cut those comments out the way they did Sally Fields anti war comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
22. Awesome!
Does anyone know who his attorney is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
23. Dan is still getting the NEWS out
even after he was driven out by CBS. It is amazing that the story of Bush's service was not false, just tossed out on a technicality. Bush Pere had a grudge against Dan because Dan called him on BS during an interview. Chimpy is all about taking revenge on people who snap back. I'm not surprised that CBS is a toady for the new administration, but I am extremely disappointed. That's why I will not watch their evening news any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
26. Expose the corporate media
Good on ya, Dan. Please don't settle, that will only embolden those assholes to further attack you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
28. The M$N has never, i repeat NEVER been on the side of The People.
All we are here for is to make them money. Period. We might as well be cows getting processed for meat or milk.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
30. How much shallower could CBS executives be than to bury Abu Ghraib to kiss Bush's ass???
The nation isn't important -- not democracy nor freedom of the press --
just sucking up to Bushco to increase their power and wealth!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. Go Dan!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwillnevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
32. Knowing how savvy and eloquent Dan is
this is a huge, giant can of worms. Let 'em out!

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
33. Liberal media? My ass!
It needed to be said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sam Ervin jret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
34. Don't Let Companies get Immunity (from civil) actions because of this!!
This is a perfect example of why we should NOT let the big communications companies(AT&T)get away with the type of legislature that they want to pass that would retroactively get them off the "hook" for spying on people on behalf of the BUSH "gang." It is often through civil actions that criminal information comes out. It is also possible that in the case of AT&T as is shown on "Front line, Spying on the Home front", At&T executives many need to be persuaded to testify against members in the administration. If they have legislation which gives their company immunity from any legal action they will have no incentive to work with the prosecution to get the truth out in the cases involving intrusive spying on the part of this administration. Companies, their executives and the powers at the head of this government are in need of a serious value check. If the checkbook is the only check on them, so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
35. Thank you, Dan! All along in this charade it was so obvious that
you were the only anchor who was hesitant to push the Bush agenda. I lost all respect for Peter Jennings when he came out with the absurd statement that Bush had won the debate against Gore. The citizens that ABC had watching,of course,gave the nod to Gore big time. Tom Brokaw has always been a shill for the GOPers. I doubt that Dan will settle...he is giving the money away. Why would he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaptBunnyPants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
36. Katie Couric is God's revenge for choosing the easy path of collaboration.
God screws those who screw themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
37. Yes, This Is Arguably War Criminality
This collaboration may have exposed Viacom to ruinous legal liablilty -- outside of the safe confines of the neofascist-rigged US Court System.

But beyond that, "consumer bad will" could devastate them far more quickly -- and permanently.

"He that lies down with dogs, shall rise up with fleas." -- Benjamin Franklin

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
38. Similar delay from the DOJ
The trial of Stephen Dale Green, whom one might remember as the prime instigator of the rape and murder of a 14-year-old girl and her family in Iraq, has already been delayed for over a year and still isn't expected to go to court until late next year...don't be surprised if it's well past the next presidential election before justice is served.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
39. Take 'em all the way down, Dan.
Report the truth. Even if that truth is about CBS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
40. CBS let the White House get away with fraud
The White House knew the documents Rather had were forged and the details of the story weren't true. The White House could have denied the story but instead they let Rather swallow the hook, so they could get even with Rather and get rid of him and scare off other potential investigative reporters to boot.

The White House even tried the same scam later on Michael Isakoff at Newsweek. Isakoff had a charge that Gitmo guards flushed a prisoner's Koran down the toilet. Isakoff checked with the Pentagon first before he went with the story. The Pentagon gave Isakoff the all clear. Then, when the story breaks, Bush and the right wing tried to destroy Isakoff for publishing a bad story. This time the press stuck together and Bush and the right wing were foiled.

If Rather can get White House officials under oath, I'd like his lawyers to ask what the White House knew and when. The truth about what really happened is far worse than many realize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
41. Bush FCC has been blackmailing Viacom/CBS since day 1, Viacom
is out of compliance with federal media ownership rules, it owns too much TV and does not want to divest, so Redstone kisses administration you know what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Could that be interpreted as bribery?
More stations = more money. If FCC agrees not to enforce the law in exchange for positive coverage, aren't they essentially trading profits for propaganda? Seems like an effective way to manage profit-driven corporate media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwillnevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
42. Larry King venue....not so much
Watching Dan Rather on Larry King deeply frustrated me. Between the many commercials and King's agenda (interrupt much??), could hardly hang in there with it. I also thought Dan was a bit tentative - maybe King threw him off balance so he lost his focus. But Dan did get his main point out that investigative journalism is dying a long, painful death in this country,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. IMO Rather came across as sincere and truthful
When it started out, Larry was trying to get the "company line" in but slowly the quality and sincerity of Rather's eloquent remarks won the day.

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. Making the case for quality journalism on the Larry King show
may have been a little too ironic for Mr. Rather.
It's kind of like going on the 700 Club and promoting rational thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
45. Attack the Messenger, Never the Message.
Same with the current moveon.org mess. The right wing always attacks the messenger, leaving the message to wilt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
47. kr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
48. What else have these bastards buried?
This is really astonishing.

They're willing to cover up that our nation tortured people--to curry favor with
the very criminals who committed the crimes?

God, these people hate the United States and all it stands for! They should not
even be in this country! They are destroying all that we have ever stood for!

They want to hide the fact that we tortured people---which would only lead us
to torturing more people?

These people work in tandem with BushCo. He couldn't have pulled off his crimes
if there were journalists left out there in the MSM. Because of their cowardice
and lack of integrity and bottomless greed--our country goes to hell.

Makes you wonder what other bombshell stories they've hidden from the American people?

What did the MSM decide that Americans didn't need to know? If they would hide torture,
they would hide anything.

Revolting. Are there any heroes out there anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. CBS spiked 60 Minutes report on the bogus Niger yellowcake claims prior to the 2004
election. They had bumped the Niger story in favor of the Bush TANG story. At first CBS said it was merely postponed. Then CBS later said it would be "inappropriate" to run their Niger yellowcake piece so close to the election. http://mediamatters.org/columns/200611200004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #49
54. Rather was on Larry King last night
He said the only way objective journalism can survive is for the truth re the pressure from big corporations and big government to be exposed.
I can't wait for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. My God... dare I hope... have we reached a turning point
Edited on Fri Sep-21-07 12:37 PM by redqueen
in public tolerance for the corporate whore media?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
50. i am SO looking forward to this trial! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
52. Can you imagine how much Fox has collaborated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. FOX was out of compliance with federal media ownership rules, too
...until the Bush administration changed them for FOX. And CNN was blackmailed by the FCC which stalled for 18 months right before the 2006 elections, deciding whether or not it would allow AOL-Time Warner to get its Adelphia acquisitions. The FCC blackmailed Disney-ABC into doing "The Path to 9/11" by threatening to recommend the McCain-Stevens A La Carte Cable Bill. They held The Tribune Co.'s federal media ownership rules violation (TV station and newspaper in LA) over their head, resulting in biased journalism before the 2006 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
57. Someone, quick, sell CBS $200 million in Army recruiting ads. To pay Dan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC