Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The tragic irony and betrayal of our efforts in World War II.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:00 PM
Original message
The tragic irony and betrayal of our efforts in World War II.
Ostensibly, our just cause in World War II was to not only check the invasions wrought by dictators, but to eliminate fascist governments as the antithesis of our democratic ideals. In reality, we stopped short of that when our government made the policy decision to leave Spain to Franco despite clear signals from the Spanish that they would have appreciated being liberated much like their German and Italian counterparts. But I suppose that is a question for more accomplished historians to debate.

Fortunately for us, World War II gave way to the Cold War with a new crop of anti-democratic enemies on whom to focus. Of course I refer to the commies whom St. Ronnie whipped single handledly in 1989.

But nationalism doesn't work all that well unless the nation has an enemy upon whom to focus. Conveniently, our foreign policy flip flopping and waffling managed to gain us a whole new breed of enemy. The Islamic radical terrorist.

The tragic irony is that in order to wage war upon such an enemy, those in power believe we must become the enemy we fought in World War II. Fascism is a system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.

From my point of view it certainly seems as if the United States if moving steadily closer to firmly fulfilling every letter of this definition.

I will not stand for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's what that war was about?
I thought it was more about multiple centers of expanding power all up to bat at the same time in their quests for total uniformity.

Nah, democratic ideals sounds better.

Anytime you have a policy of elimination, how many outcomes can there be? You can't democratically annihilate something.

We're still involved in a quest for total uniformity. Our side won, so it's our uniformity that has the shot. Too much real diversity, and not a thing would get done in this world. There wouldn't be a road built, any economies of scale, no bombs with which to win wars for democratic ideals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Pssst....
the word "ostensibly" is a clue to the meaning of the sentence. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's what that word means?
I thought pacifist was more along the lines of non-violent. Becaue you just opened up Pandora's Box my friend :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You are leaving me utterly baffled.
Ostensibly our just cause....Focus on the words 'ostensibly' and 'just.' I would never ever suggest there was only one cause for World War II or even speculate on what it might be. I don't know about you, but as a school child I had the whole "saving the world for democracy" meme heaped upon me every time I turned around which is what makes the irony of our current situation so thick.

Pacifism: The belief that disputes between nations should and can be settled peacefully. Opposition to war as a means of resolving disputes.

I realize you have zeroed in on my screen name, but I'm not sure what that has to do with my assertion that fascism is alive and well in our government these days. Is it because I said "I won't stand for it?" I take my inspiration from the likes of Gandhi and King. I'm prepared to oppose fascist actions on the part of my government in a variety of creative ways. It doesn't mean I have to resort to armed conflict. If I'm missing your point, I truly apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. There were wealthy influential influences within business and the government
during WWII which were sympathetic with fascist Italy and Spain, and Nazi Germany. It's been inherent within the body of our nation long before we fought for others' freedoms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC