Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another Feith-Based Foreign Policy Idea? The "United States-Israel Energy Cooperation Act"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 12:36 PM
Original message
Another Feith-Based Foreign Policy Idea? The "United States-Israel Energy Cooperation Act"
"To authorize funding for eligible joint ventures between United States and Israeli businesses and academic persons, to establish the International Energy Advisory Board, and for other purposes."

<...>

"There is established in the Department of Energy an International Energy Advisory Board."

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22international+energy+advisory+board%22

Personally, I think the idea of forming a non-governmental organization of energy-consuming nations - as a counterweight to OPEC - is a marvelous idea. But it seems to me that that organization ought to have at least as many members as OPEC (rather than just 2), and it should be an NGO (not residing within our Department of Energy).

This bill was introduced in the last Congress as HR 2730: http://thomas.loc.gov/home/multicongress/multicongress.html

The "academic persons" language is undefined, but would probably be deemed to include Doug Feith's current position at Georgetown University (where he was not exactly received with a warm welcome): http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=douglas+feith+georgetown

I understand the need for bilateral cooperation and agreements with our allies, including Israel. But the "optics" of this legislation - establishing a board that advises on doling out grants to entities that must include Israel citizens/entities - must look skewed to others with whom we would like to live in peace.

A truly "international" body would be informed by the history of solar science. Progression from worship to scientific understanding has been a truly international affair, and continues into the present: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun

Who's to say that the next Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, or Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar isn't on the cusp of a breakthrough in learning a simple way to harness the solar constant - delivering energy independence to all nations? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_constant#Solar_constant

And who's to say that that modern-day scientific observer - out of all the billions of people with firsthand familiarity with the sun - resides in one of those two countries?

Any school child can replicate Sir Isaac Newton's prism experiment; once demonstrated, it literally became child's play. Setting only two seats at the table of this "international" body practically begs the non-aligned nations to form a larger, more inclusive body - where the next "child's play" scientific breakthrough could transform the global economy and petropolitik.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC