|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:25 PM Original message |
Were there 5 nukes or 6? I've read both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. One would be too many, but I heard two. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. two? nope haven't read that one yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
3. Do you think that they would give us a straight answer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. No, But the leaker, what did he/she say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. there were 6 but they returned 5 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
5. is there one missing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:39 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Who the hell knows. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
6. started wiht five and now gone to six |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. All of it is just too fucking disturbing. Most alarming bullshit to date. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
8. you tell me...do you feel lucky, punk?...well do ya? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:44 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. What's with the punk shit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:26 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. reference to the classic Dirty Harry line. No harm intended |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 12:44 AM Response to Reply #18 |
28. Oh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
9. Six When It Took Off - Five When It Landed (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:43 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Nice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. no--see the reason below--reporting error by the story source. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:35 PM Response to Reply #9 |
21. No--it was an error on the part of the source to the story, later corrected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 12:45 AM Response to Reply #21 |
29. Caught your answer on down thread. Thanks MaDerm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
13. Kent Conrad and Byron Dorgan, learned of the bomber mishap on September 4th in classified briefings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Thanks SLAD. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. 5 days after the fact. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ready4Change (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
16. That's my biggest question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:26 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. And military investigations take oh about foreva. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
20. Six. The original report said five, but the corrected one said six. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:37 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Did someone finally count what showed up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:42 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Military Times broke this story, and their source was an officer or officers at the base. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 12:06 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Thanks MADem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 12:29 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. They're anonymous. Known to the reporter, though. Those papers are not DOD. They're indy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 12:31 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. I hope they are not ferreted away for a fingernail job until they divulge their sources. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 01:52 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. Hell, it could be one of the duty officers--and not even someone who was on the flight line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
entanglement (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
30. 6 in all. 5 carried by the B-52, the 6th one went to Ebay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 01:15 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tyedyeto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
32. Edited to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 06:23 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC