Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Greenwald laughs out loud over the sight of NRO's newest manly man commentator Mark Hemingway

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 07:54 PM
Original message
Greenwald laughs out loud over the sight of NRO's newest manly man commentator Mark Hemingway
Edited on Wed Sep-05-07 07:57 PM by BurtWorm
I think we can all enjoy a good laugh at the manly man's expense: :spray:

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2007/09/05/hemingway/index.html

National Review's new tough guy, Mark Hemingway

(updated below)

From Jonah Goldberg to Rich Lowry, National Review has long been renowned for its roster of tough-guy commentators -- real salt-of-the-earth conservative men who love to let you know what tough warriors they are. The latest addition to this impressive roster of traditional manliness is new staff writer Mark Hemingway.

In his article on Larry Craig last week, Hemingway noted that there was nothing surprising about Craig's homosexuality because he was "a member of 'The Singing Senators' barbershop." Today, in a post at The Corner, Hemingway linked to an article speculating that David Souter cried after being on the losing end of Bush v. Gore, and Hemingway wrote:

Did Souter cry over 2000 recount vote? <Mark Hemingway>

Of all the Supreme Court justices, I always suspected he was the sissy mary. Scalia probably waits outside his chamber to steal his lunch money.


Just initially -- as discovered by TS -- here is the Tough Guy and Defender of Traditional Masculine Virtues, Mark Hemingway:


...



As has been noted many times before, those who have a never-ending need publicly to call into question the masculinity of others in order to make political points -- whether it be James Taranto, Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Reynolds -- are so frequently the precise antithesis of the virtues of traditional masculinity they accuse others of lacking. That this is so is neither surprising nor hard to decipher.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good stuff
I especially like the email that Greenwald sent to Hemingway:

Mr. Hemingway - I'm writing a piece for Salon on your blog item today regarding David Souter. I have a few questions:

(1) By "sissy mary," do you mean "homosexual" or just a girly-man?

(2) The new John Draper book reports that George Bush "is prone to bouts of crying caused by the stress of his job" and quotes Bush saying: "I've got God's shoulder to cry on. And I cry a lot. I do a lot of crying in this job. I'll bet I've shed more tears than you can count, as president. I'll shed some tomorrow."

Does that make George Bush a "sissy mary," too? If not, what's the difference?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Who else was in that 'singing senators' group?
Can they be outed now that one has already been outed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Who, Lott or Ashcroft?
I don't think either one of them is gay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Men who sing aren't all arrested for lewd behavior or end up being
trashed by idiot National Review writers as "girly men" or whatever other trash those folks write over at that rag, though

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Hey! Singing is hard work!
by Marge Piercy
http://www.margepiercy.com/

One reason I like opera

In movies, you can tell the heroine
because she is blonder and thinner
than her sidekick. The villainess
is darkest. If a woman is fat,
she is a joke and will probably die.

In movies, the blondest are the best
and in bleaching lies not only purity
but victory. If two people are both
extra pretty, they will end up
in the final clinch.

Only the flawless in face and body
win. That is why I treat
movies as less interesting
than comic books. The camera
is stupid. It sucks surfaces.

Let's go to the opera instead.

The heroine is fifty and weighs
as much as a '65 Chevy with fins.
She could crack your jaw in her fist.
She can hit high C lying down.

The tenor the women scream for
wolfs an eight course meal daily.
He resembles a bull on hind legs.
His thighs are the size of beer kegs.
His chest is a redwood with hair.

Their voices twine, golden serpents.
Their voices rise like the best
fireworks and hang and hang
then drift slowly down descending
in brilliant and still fiery sparks.

The hippopotamus baritone (the villain)
has a voice that could give you
an orgasm right in your seat.
His voice smokes with passion.
He is hot as lava. He erupts nightly.

The contralto is, however, svelte.
She is supposed to be the soprano's
mother, but is ten years younger,
beautiful and black. Nobody cares.
She sings you into her womb where you rock.

What you see is work like digging a ditch,
hard physical labor. What you hear
is magic as tricky as knife throwing.
What you see is strength like any
great athlete's; what you hear

is skill rendered precisely as the best
Swiss watchmaker. The body is
resonance. The body is the cello case.
The body just is. The voice loud
as hunger remagnetizes your bones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Ha ha!
:toast:

Here's to Glenn Greenwald and fearlessness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. A bathroom pic, no less!
The sweet sweet irony. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. traditional masculinity


Hasn't that notion cost us enough?

I try to stay away from disparaging people's looks. They don't matter, really although i see why "it's the hypocrisy" here.

So: "Sorry, Mr. Hemingway, but I think you might be projecting just a teensy widdle bit."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. That whole column is a terrific read
Especially the e-mail Greenwald sent to Hemingway, and Hemingway's weaselly response.

I can't wait for Greenwald's book. He is great, just great, and I'm very glad Salon is giving him greater visibility.

Thanks for posting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hemingway is a Phillips Foundation Journalism "Fellow"
a motley crew of propagandists, fascists, freepers,
some work for Doublethink magazine (it's actually called that),
some work for Project for the New American Century (PNAC):
http://www.thephillipsfoundation.org/index.php?q=fellowship_profiles


Project: "Anti-Everything: Anti-Globalization, Anti-War, Resurrected Radicalism and its Un-American Roots," examining the ideas and beliefs of young people in the anti-globalization and anti-war movements. Currently he is the Monetary Policy Correspondent for Market News International covering the Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury. Additionally, he is a freelance writer whose work has appeared in many publications. He has been a Global Prosperity Initiative fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, and an editor at the DC Examiner. Previously, Mark served as an editor and communications director for the Hudson Institute in Washington. He worked as a reporter and staff writer at The American Spectator after an editorial page fellowship at USA Today. He graduated from the University of Oregon with a B.S. in journalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. What an ugly, worthless piece of shite!
Manly man, my arse. I'd like five minutes alone with ANY of the National Review "manly man" types. Five fucking minutes. Oh, and by the way, I am GAY, GAY GAY! And I don't take shit from anyone, much less "manly men."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. "B.S. in journalism"
I'll say!

Only in conservative circles is such a worthless loser as this jerk considered a valued asset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. Oooh! He's having a contest to name his book
I just sent him my idea:

DickShtick: How Does the G.O.P. Measure Up? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
13. Nice Man Boob
on that Manly Man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
15. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
16. This guy (Mike Gallagher) is on the radio every day
decrying the "sissification of American males."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. It takes a real man to look like that and pretend to be an arbiter of what's male.
:eyes:

The right is just full of 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Beavis or Butthead
in a suit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
17. How many years did he serve in the military?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
19. I think it's interesting that he would joke about a
Edited on Thu Sep-06-07 09:20 AM by Marr
judge being wimpy, and bullied by a judge he likes.

I've always thought a large part of the modern conservative movement is comprised of former schoolyard bullies. The GOP has three major constituencies: religious nuts, corporate executives, and assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. My god. Conservative men are simply CONSUMED by.....
Edited on Thu Sep-06-07 08:27 PM by Jade Fox
acute Homosexual Panic. According to this from Wikipedia, they need hospitalization. Start rounding them up. Please!:o


Homosexual panic<1><2> is a term, first coined by psychiatrist Edward J. Kempf in 1920, describing an acute, brief reactive psychosis involving delusions and hallucinations accusing a person of various homosexual activities. Despite the psychotic nature of the disorder, Kempf called it "acute homosexual panic". The disorder is also known in Kempf's honour as "Kempf's disease".

Treatment usually involves hospitalization, firstly to remove the person from the situation and also because the condition may lead to suicidal or homicidal acts. Antipsychotics, either the typical or atypical, help symptoms subside if they continue much after admission. It is best to avoid further provocation and for this reason caregivers often are selected from members of the opposite sex, and invasive procedures such as injections with needles or suppositories are avoided. Return to previous levels of adaptation is common after symptoms subside, but treatment usually involves advice not to return to the type of environment that prompted the condition.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC