Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leahy: "The stonewalling leaves me...considering citations for contempt of Congress..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 12:15 PM
Original message
Leahy: "The stonewalling leaves me...considering citations for contempt of Congress..."

Leahy wants meeting with Bush on testimony

By Klaus Marre
August 14, 2007

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), at the urging of the panel’s ranking member, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), on Tuesday requested a meeting with President Bush to hammer out a deal that would allow key White House aides to testify before the panel on the firing of several U.S. attorneys.

Leahy indicated that this is a last-ditch effort, saying that his previous efforts to get the White House to cooperate have failed to yield results.

“The stonewalling leaves me and the Senate Judiciary Committee with few options other than considering citations for contempt of Congress against those who have refused to provide relevant testimony and documents to the Congress,” he said.

Leahy noted that Specter, who is unhappy with the conditions the White House wants to place on testimony from top aides but has been seeking to reach a compromise, urged him to contact the president directly.

While Democrats want the aides to testify as any other witness would, White House Counsel Fred Fielding has made a “take it or leave it” offer that would place severe restrictions on any such testimony. The administration does not want the staffers to be placed under oath and said there should be no transcript of the conversation between the lawmakers and the White House aides.


No more deals. Enough! Slap them with contempt!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wish he'd just do it and quit talking about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. If you've done nothing wrong, and you don't plan to lie, then why be afraid
of going under oath? Leahy better be talking about INHERENT contempt--capitol jail time, baby!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. precisely......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Specter allready publicly said he would accept the conditions of the WH-he
said this at the last hearing (then Leahy said we'd talk about it).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Twelve-More-Days Leahy is gonna threaten them? With what?
'Considering' citations for contempt. Oh this is hysterical. His hissy fits have worked so we thus far.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. "considering"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. enough with the gentleman approach. They play hardball-YOU need to play hardball!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yap-yap-yap-yap-yap. This chihuahua is starting to annoy me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. When they do it I'll believe it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. No more deals. Enough! Slap them with contempt!
Only problem with that is, what do you do when they ignore that, too?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. Go to Crawford, Mr. Leahy
I believe you can find the president there for the rest of the month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. If you hit me again and I find out about it, you better reconsider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. Mr. Specter wants the meeting according to Administration conditions.
Senator Arlen Specter is an administration shill. Any process; investigative, legislative, that involves magic bullet Specter has no credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. Dammit. NO COMPROMISES on PUBLIC testimony...
we DESERVE TO KNOW THE TRUTH. Cite them already....quit considering it...DO IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. IT MUST BE PUBLIC!
They must be under oath.
There must be a transcript.
They must answer the questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. Dear Mr Leahy,
Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt
Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt
Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt
Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt
Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt Inherent Contempt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anita Garcia Donating Member (869 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
17. Just do it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC