Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hastert Used Military Aircraft To Fly Foley Page Scandal Figure To Washington

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:57 PM
Original message
Hastert Used Military Aircraft To Fly Foley Page Scandal Figure To Washington
The media continues to pound a false Washington Times report accusing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) of wasting government resources by “demanding permanent access to a large military jet for herself, her staff, other Members and supporters.”

In fact, Pelosi’s office has stated repeatedly, from the beginning, that “it is up to the Air Force to decide what type and size of plane will be required,” and that she “will not use the plane for political travel.”

Conservatives have tried to bolster their attack by claiming that former Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL) only used his military aircraft for official business. The Washington Times quoted an unnamed “former Hastert aide” saying Hastert “did not use military planes for political trips or regularly transport his family.” But Chicago Sun-Times reporter Lynne Sweet says that isn’t true:

On Sunday, Oct. 1, Hastert’s team was scrambling to contain the escalating fallout from the Foley page scandal.

That day, Rep. John Shimkus (R-Ill.), then the chairman of the page board, had gotten an urgent phone call from Stokke. The Hastert team wanted Shimkus to return to Washington immediately from his home in southern Illinois in order to appear at a press conference on Monday with the Speaker, and they did not want to deal with commercial flight schedules.

So at 8 p.m. that day, Shimkus arrived at the military side of the Scott Air Force Base near Belleville to board the Speaker’s jet that had been dispatched for him.

The plane then headed to an airport near Aurora, Ill., to pick up Hastert, who had been weekending at his home in Plano, before flying on to Washington.

That Monday, Hastert and Shimkus headlined a press conference in the Capitol to talk about the Foley resignation.

For those who don’t remember, Shimkus is the former House Page Board chair who learned of Foley’s inappropriate emails and then refused to inform the Democrat on the board, Rep. Dale Kildee (D-MI).

Pelosi said today she will fly commercial rather than use the aircraft offered by the Pentagon, which cannot reach her home district in California without stopping to refuel.

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/08/hastert-flight/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. has this been on the talk shows? bet not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Any Democrat on any talk show could bring it up. Have they?
Edited on Thu Feb-08-07 02:48 PM by Dr Fate
Or do we still expect Republican owned "journalists"
to do our work for us?

All the talk shows you refer to have Democratic guests pretty much everyday who could bring this up.

The media has stopped talking about the Foley scandal, true, but then again, I havent heard many DEMS with media access bring it up either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomofthehill Donating Member (578 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. When do Democrats get to appear on talk shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I see them on TV shows every single day. Which show is banning them?
Name the cable news show that does not have DEM guests on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomofthehill Donating Member (578 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Real Democrats
Not the Dick Morris Zell Miller types are not so easy to find and when you find them, they do not controll the airtime so they are not free to go up field with questions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. So Dean, Obama, Reid, Kerry, Pelosi, Hillary, etc are not "real democrats?"
Edited on Thu Feb-08-07 04:50 PM by Dr Fate
I've seen them all on TV shows multiple times- and I have never heard them claim that their hired, professional PR people are being denied access to the producers of cable TV news shows.

Can you back up your claim? Please show me where Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Obama or any "real" household name Democrat has claimed that they were denied access to a TV show or "not allowed" to bring up certain issues subjects once they were on.

If the media is censoring "real" elected DEMS, yet no elected DEMS are willing to inform us of this fact by making that claim, then I see 2 problems, not one.

I think that if a "real", elected Democrat is NOT on TV saying something, it is because the did not want to say it-for whatever reason, not because someone held a gun to them and ordered them not to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
36. No one disputes the fact that Democrats do appear, multiple times, on TV.
What I am interpreting the point that the poster was trying to make, is that:

1) Democrats apprear INFREQUENTLY and MUCH MUCH LESS THAN REPUKES on all these shows. While it is all too common to have ONLY REPUKES without ANY Democrats on the various TV shows, ALL THE TIME, when a Democrat appears, infrequently at best, they are ALWAYS "paired" with a repuke.

2) While repukes always are sought out to for comment on various stories, be they repuke or Democratic, Democrats are RARELY on to make similar comments.

3) When Democrats are on, they are routinely cut off or the direction of the discussion is steared towards trying to get a repuke spin on the discussion. Not so when repukes are on, they are allowed to spew LIES WIHTOUT PROTEST or followup, and they are always allowed to finish their intended spew...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dracos Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Oh you mean FOX NOISE
the whores of the GOP Greedy Old Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomofthehill Donating Member (578 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. When was the last time you say a democrat on
Glynn Beck's show?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. That is one show. I've never watched it. What about the rest of the shows?
Edited on Thu Feb-08-07 05:18 PM by Dr Fate
I've never seen his show- if you say he is not allowing Democrats on, fine. I've never heard a prominent Democrat accuse him of not letting them on for equal time. If his producers are turning down requests from DEMS to be on, I'd love to hear those DEMS say so.

I've seen many household name DEMS on TV shows hundreds & hundreds of times with my own eyes- that's one way they got so well-known to begin with- by appearing on talk shows multiple times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Beck did take time out from bashing penguins...
Edited on Thu Feb-08-07 05:12 PM by TWriterD
to interview that big, bad scary Ellison in November. Remember "Sir, prove to me that you are not working with our enemies."? Since November, I have no idea, but that dude from Syracuse who slammed him with "I don't think this story is going to get you a Peabody ." was definitely worth tuning in to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. I'm sure Hannity will get right on it.
After all, he "likes to get his facts straight".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
And bookmarking. Good spot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Wash Times concerned about "wasting government resources"
that is so rich. bush was given a surplus and now brags about balancing the budget in five years. What happened to the surplus? bush wastes billions of dollars a month because he lied to become a war president and the speaker of the house is wasting resources? Gosh if I were a constitution hating ignorant trash bush supporter I'd give this story merit too.

Surely all those morons yakking on the floor of the house can't believe this is good press for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. they believe (know?) their supporters to be that stupid,
so yeah... i think they do expect it'll be good press
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sweet Justice - If true, thanks to lies we learn the truth. If only
people would step forward like this everytime there is a foul attack trick like one was. Get the word out if this is true. Test it by calling it to your Republican Representative - especially people in Illinois.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. If there was an ethical, unbiased media
A stunt like this would reverse the searchlight onto the endless corruption and abuse of Government resources for partisan gain by the squealing pigs, the proud hypocrites that go by the name of Conservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. I would LOVE to have a complete run down of every time Hastert used a
government plane and have Nancy go to the House floor and throw it in their faces. How much money did Hastert spend on flying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomofthehill Donating Member (578 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Time for a FOIA Request or a Congressional Hearing
Now that we have subpoena authority, it may be time to use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. You WILL--Jack MURTHA has vowed to INVESTIGATE GOP "OFFICIAL TRAVEL"
He's going to use his chair convening authority, and look into ALL administration travel...so we'll no doubt see some interesting use of aircraft.

Mark my words, by being shitty asswipes, the GOP has unleashed the wrath of Murtha. That's his gal, Nancy, and he's not gonna let this slide.

And the Pentagon is in BIG trouble, too--because someone got shitty there, and someone cattily called the press.

It will be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Woohoo! Go Murtha! This just keeps getting better and better!
The repukes just don't know when to stop DIGGING their hole!:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. Call the House Ethics Committee for hearings and demand the...
...establishment of a bipartisan commission called "The National Commission of U.S. Government Child Pornography and Sex Predators" to further review the Foley case and reopen the Franklin case from the late 80's and early 90's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. I am sooo glad that repuke just can't seem to keep their KNOWN hypocricy in check & their mouths
shut.

Now back to Anna Nichole Smith's death...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. The Washington Times is still at it
They ran another Pelosi story today. They also went with this lunatic editorial:

In 1983, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy offered to help the Soviets mount a public-relations offensive in the United States. This propaganda attack would target President Reagan and his policies. These are the same policies that eventually ended the Cold War and reduced the possibility of nuclear annihilation. This charge was made by Paul Kengor in his book "The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism."

(snip)

According to this research and released KGB papers, Mr. Kennedy felt that the booming economy during Mr. Reagan's presidency made him popular — and thus a difficult target for Democratic criticism. Because of this, Mr. Kennedy reportedly felt that Mr. Reagan's only weakness was in foreign policy. Here, the articles say Mr. Kennedy felt the Soviets might be of assistance, if Mr. Kennedy and the Democrats could get the ear of the general-secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
Numerous articles also saidthatthisanti-Reagan/anti-U.S. conspiracy was not a one-man operation by Mr. Kennedy. They indicate that former Sen. John V. Tunney, a California Democrat, went to Moscow and met with officials of the KGB on Mr. Kennedy's behalf. Additionally, in their book "The Sword And The Shield," Christopher Andrew and Vasili Metrokhin said that as early as 1975 the KGB began operations to penetrate the inner circles of a number of leading Democrats, including the likes of Mr. Kennedy and Ramsey Clark. They also mentioned that a Democratic Party activist had been recruited by the KGB and had supplied the Soviets with information from a variety of Democratic leaders, including President Carter.

(END) http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20070207-090506-1276r.htm

The real scandal is that "legitimate" media outlets use the Washington Times as a source for anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
21. Good!
Not only that, it is INAPPROPRIATE for someone a BORG heart CLICK away from the Presidency to be riding around in COMMERCIAL jetliners.

This woman is THIRD in line to the White House and is not afforded the security, comfort and protection that those CRIMINALS are? We should lobby that Pelosi DESERVES, REQUIRES and that it would be Irresponsible to NOT have her in a Plane worthy of Bush or Cheney, or as close as possible to it.

Use their Logic, "It's a DANGEROUS WORLD, POST 911" and she is a potential target, etc, etc

Let's see how many fucking HOEDOWNS BUSH attended at 55 THOUSAND dollars an HOUR on OUR DIME..

Let's think about Wellstone a minute, shall we?

I would not put ANYTHING past these monsters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Everyone, repeat this--John ASHCROFT rode in PRIVATE JETS BEFORE 9-11
And he was hardly right behind Tick Tock in the line of Presidential Succession...in fact, he's WELL back in the pack. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/07/26/national/main303601.shtml


Ashcroft Flying High

WASHINGTON, July 26, 2001
CBS) Fishing rod in hand, Attorney General John Ashcroft left on a weekend trip to Missouri Thursday afternoon aboard a chartered government jet, reports CBS News Correspondent Jim Stewart.

In response to inquiries from CBS News over why Ashcroft was traveling exclusively by leased jet aircraft instead of commercial airlines, the Justice Department cited what it called a "threat assessment" by the FBI, and said Ashcroft has been advised to travel only by private jet for the remainder of his term.

"There was a threat assessment and there are guidelines. He is acting under the guidelines," an FBI spokesman said. Neither the FBI nor the Justice Department, however, would identify what the threat was, when it was detected or who made it.

A senior official at the CIA said he was unaware of specific threats against any Cabinet member, and Ashcroft himself, in a speech in California, seemed unsure of the nature of the threat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. M'dear
MADem, PLEASE send this article off immediately to Keith Olbermann?!

And I will too if the rest of you will, PASS THIS NUGGET AROUND, this will cook their goose, no way around it. :)

Thanks for this, beautiful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. The GOP is backing off--they're making the House Clerk take the rap!
They should be ashamed of themselves....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #26
34. This is a double scandal since they didn't bother to let the public
know there was a threat to commercial aviation. Ashcroft was saving his own skin and risking the rest of the flying public. We know how that worked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
23. Infuriating.
Pelosi should DEMAND pentagon transportation if Hastert had it. And what the fuck...Aircraft offered by the pentagon has to stop to refuel? Maybe one of those zillion dollar planes should be built by Boeing so it can be up to ar with 30 year old commercial aircraft...It might save some money.

Ass hats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zambero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. The end always justifies the means
The means is retaining, or in this instance regaining absolute control, whatever it takes. It worked just fine for Stalin. And the lying swiftboating hypocritical character-assassinating GOP wholeheartedly bought into that same "principle" long ago!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedzbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
28. A 737 is NOT a jumbo jet!!!
The Los Angeles Times erroneously claimed it was a "jumbo" type jet which is false. A 737 is a single aisle passenger jet and is considered the smallest of Boeing's models. It's probably not much more expensive to fly than one of the Air Force Gulf Streams that are considered more appropriate.

This bugs me because most people will take the jumbo claim on face value. It's nothing but slander.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
29. .
For when I need to :rofl: tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZaiusNation Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
30. Nancy Pelosi's is bigger...Dennis Hastert's? Not so much.

I was just watching Lou Dobbs tonight, and he is still going on about the Republican bilge about Nancy Pelosi and their claim that she has asked the military for some extra special pimped out ride. He was gleefully telling the tale, disregarding the fact that the story was debunked almost a week ago. Will somebody please tell Mr. Dobbs that there is an illegal immigrant in his bran muffin?


Zaius Nation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. And deny him the pleasure
of PUBLICLY Shitting said Immigrant OUT? :)

I told my wife the other day that if you cut Lou Dobbs open, THOUSANDS of little Lou Dobbs would fall out :)

I'm pretty sure there's one of those doohickeys on the back of his neck like you see on a car tire, where you put the air in, and he can REACH it..

Good one, thanks, funny stuff!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seldona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
33. Yet not a peep when * refurbished the presidential YACHT
These people are so full of shit they must have it coming from every orifice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmhand Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
35. Operating costs are lower for the 737, only 10k per hour
Well I was reading on the costs of the 737 and its around about $10,000 per hour to operate, and the 747 is much higher. We need to keep in mind that our government officials need this kind of service. With the kinds of budgets they have to work with I don't see why they should have to fly around with regular people. Considering what we are spending on the Iraq war and the 3 Jets for the Bush Administration, one of them being the most expensive jet to fly in the world, Air force 1 , why should members of Congress not get one too. Pelosi is right to ask for a jet that can get her all the way across the country without having to stop for fuel. What I don't understand is why can't they just fuel her in the air, this is a military plane right? What I can't stand is all these conservative types talking about how they don't get a private jet. They act as if the money isn't spent, like its going to be returned to the people or spent on the poor, what hypocrites the Repugs are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IWantAChange Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
38. Rev. Moon's Washington Times w/false report on Dem's? tsk tsk
In Repug BizzaroWorld if IT DIDN'T APPEAR THAT WOULD BE NEWSWORTHY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughttheater Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
39. Tongue-in-cheek visual
See a tongue-in-cheek visual of "Nancy's Flight Of Fancy"...here:

www.thoughttheater.com

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
40. For those that do remember Mr. Foley was Chair of the House Caucus
on Missing and Exploited Children

"The National Center For Missing And Exploited Children Board Of Directors" from 10-1-2006
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x2280827
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtracy9 Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
41. Pentagon Planes Unsafe for Democratic Politicians
In an interview with Fox News, Pelosi speculated that Department of Defense officials were distorting the story as retribution for her stance against the war and former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.

"There are probably those in the Department of Defense who are not happy with my criticism of Secretary Rumsfeld, the war in Iraq, other waste, fraud and abuse in the Defense Department, and I guess this is their way of making their voices heard," she said.

I was thinking that Pelosi might be advised to take commercial transportation. The Pentagon and its CIA allies have a history of making planes crash, especially their own planes, as with Ron Brown. Unfortunately, American politicians have more to fear from right-wingers in the Pentagon then they do from any likely terrorist attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC