Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FDR won WW 2 in 1,347 days. Bush is over that in one country and still losing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:00 AM
Original message
FDR won WW 2 in 1,347 days. Bush is over that in one country and still losing
badly (any normal commander would declare victory and go home - no wmds or nukes, got rid of saddam, held elections, got a local government in charge - our part over, see ya).

Of course the US had lots of help from its allies in WW2. Still, with millions of American men and women in uniform against 3 axis enemies, FDR did something bush is incapable of doing - fighting a legitimate, honest, moral, and legal war and declaring victory.

Msongs
www.msongs.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. FDR was beloved around the world and competent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Vietnam War went on for 10+ years. I expect that this one will
go on for 20+, or until the oil is gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. FDR died before WW2 ended
But we firebombed German and Japanese civilian populations and Truman nuked 2 Japanese civilian cities to "win" a war that FDR let happen to pull the US economy out of the Repuke Calvin Coolidge's great depression. WW2 was based on money just as much as what Bush is doing for oil now. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh bullshit
Unlike Saddam Hussein, Hitler was actually a threat. If you don't believe it ask the people who were living in England, France, Poland, or hell most of Eastern Europe during World War II.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Uh, Didn't Hitler DECLARE War On US?
And couldn't that declaration be believed since he was invading one country after another? Quite a big difference from what Saddam did, if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I ain't saying Hitler was a good guy
However
On September 11, 1941, the President of the United States publicly declared that he had ordered the American Navy and Air Force to shoot on sight at any German war vessel. In his speech of October 27, 1941, he once more expressly affirmed that this order was in force. Acting under this order, vessels of the American Navy, since early September 1941, have systematically attacked German naval forces. Thus, American destroyers, as for instance the Greer, the Kearney and the Reuben James, have opened fire on German sub-marines according to plan. The Secretary of the American Navy, Mr. Knox, himself confirmed that-American destroyers attacked German submarines.

Furthermore, the naval forces of the United States, under order of their Government and contrary to international law have treated and seized German merchant vessels on the high seas as enemy ships.

The German Government therefore establishes the following facts:

Although Germany on her part has strictly adhered to the rules of international law in her relations with the United States during every period of the present war, the Government of the United States from initial violations of neutrality has finally proceeded to open acts of war against Germany. The Government of the United States has thereby virtually created a state of war.

The German Government, consequently, discontinues diplomatic relations with the United States of America and declares that under these circumstances brought about by President Roosevelt Germany too, as from today, considers herself as being in a state of war with the United States of America.


Odd the Sept. 11 reference.

I don't know what the hell business it was of ours what was happening in Europe. Hitler was not a threat to us any more than Saddam was. Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, not Germany, and FDR allowed that to happen as well. The government knew it was comming and did nothing to stop it, much like 9-11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. You Know, I Would Have Laughed At That Before
but after all that has happened, I no longer can. Can't I just keep some ignorance about the past? I liked thinking America was a good country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Y'think maybe that order was given
because German U-boats were torpedoing Allied merchant ships transporting goods and machinery to Britain under the Lend-Lease Act?

Wow. Just... wow. :crazy:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Of course it was
But lend-lease was a "back door" way for FDR to get us involved in a war in Europe that most of the people in America were opposed to. I know my parents weren't ready to pull Europes fat out of the fire again and many others in this country weren't either. This country had enough with WW1, the "WAR TO END ALL WARS". My point is that the OP is comparing Iraq with the "good war", WW2, there is no good, pure of motive war!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. How many were opposed to it
once we got into it? Once the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor? Once the Holocaust and Bataan became common knowledge? The treatment of American POWs by the Japanese?

And please don't tell me FDR goaded the Japanese into attacking to prop up his reasons for going to war. That's so old and tired.

No war is "good," but a few are necessary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. War
Germany declared war on the United States as a result of our declaration of war on Japan. The Germans were acting in accordance with their mutual defense pact with Japan. It is normal for a country at that time to respond to a declaration of war with their own declaration of war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. true indeed
world war 2 was a global military takeover of the world via neo-corporatism, all to supress the socialist
rebellion that stirreth... to finally marx the public with the opiate of perpetual race wars of the stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superman Returns Donating Member (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. but to be fair...
Bush's war was a catastrophic failure and blunder. However in WW2 it was "total war" Our aim was to unconditionally defeat our enemies by making them surrender to us. Iraq on the other hand is a "nation building" mission. There is no remaining capital to capture, no treaties left to sign. We are not trying to defeat Iraq but instead build it up by proping up a democratic regime in the country. We were always good at winning wars...just never good at winning the peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. If you consider a war to be one nation's military against another's
the war in Iraq didn't last very long. It is a bit confusing because you hear the terms Iraq war and Iraq occupation used almost interchangeably for what is going on now.

Of course, there was an occupation of Germany and Japan for years after WW II ended. Heck, there are still US military bases in Germany and Okinawa. Of course, the occupations of Germany and Japan were much more, but not totally, peaceful than what is happening in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. Let's have some historical accuracy
I am NOT disagreeing with the gist of the OP; it's spot on, IMO.

But FDR did not win WWII, nor did America. The Allies did. Without Russia's tremendous campaigns in Stalingrad and along the Eastern Front, and without Britain's valorous beat-back of the Luftwaffe in the Battle of Britain — before America even entered the war — U.S. forces in Europe would've been squashed.

I hate this term since I spent so much of my working life talking to high school coaches, but it was indeed a team effort.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gruenemann Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. FDR had help!
If it hadn't been for our Soviet allies, we'd have had a much harder time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC