Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could the government prevent coal mine accidents?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 03:44 PM
Original message
Could the government prevent coal mine accidents?
I know they cite the mines for violations but do they ever enforce the regulations? Ever heard of the government shutting a mine down? I haven't.

Years ago my husband's job took us to a small coal mining town in VA. In order to get a job I ended up working for the Bureau of Mines. The inspectors were constantly citing a mine for violations but I never heard of one being shut down until the violations were corrected.

As a side note: One my very first day a report came across my desk of an 18 year old on his first day of the job who had his arm ripped off at the shoulder by a machine he had not been properly trained to use.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course not. That's a very unrealistic expectation.
The government can (and should) help to ensure a certain level of safety in mines reducing accidents to a hopefully very small amount; but of course it cannot prevent accidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Like bridge collapses, when is an "accident" a forseeable outcome of neglect?
Yes, government can prevent - as in reduce greatly the likelihood and frequency of - collapses.

Eliminate entirely? Probably not.

But prevent them?

Yes, indeedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. To "prevent" means to "eliminate entirely"; or in this case, "to keep from happening"
A basic understanding of physics and engineering (and some economics) will also help in understanding why accidents are IMPOSSIBLE to prevent by anyone or anything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. There is a world of difference...
Edited on Tue Aug-07-07 04:04 PM by TechBear_Seattle
... between accidents and murder-by-neglect.

Accidents happen when you take reasonable safety precautions, fix problems when they are found, keep everything in good repair, have a plan for when something goes wrong and then follow that plan.

Murder-by-neglect happens when you do not take reasonable safety precautions, do not fix problems when they are found, do not keep things in good repair and either do not follow your emergency plan or do not have one in the first place.

What happened in Minnesota was murder-by-neglect, according to all of the news reports I've seen. The state and federal governments had known for years that the bridge was dangerous. That the bridge failed was no accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Maybe if they shut some mines down
for safety violations it would get the owners attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 03:49 PM
Original message
Probably not PREVENT them, but Canada seems to have initiated safety precautions
that prevent death!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. You beat me to it
There will always be accidents, and deaths. It is the nature of the job. However, there is a lot of negligence by the mine owners, and taking the cheap way out to keep the profits up. That causes accidents too, and those are the accidents that are preventable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech3149 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Historically, union mines have a much higher level of saftey
It's a balance between the operators and the workers. The workers see the problems up close and personal. If they don't have some collective force, as in a union or shared ownership, the operators can push for performance without any serious balancing power. Anyone who goes down in a mine knows the risk, but if you don't have the power and voice to point out the problems, that risk increases exponentially.

My GF was the supervisor for a mine and the hardest part of the job was keeping the workers safe and keeping the bosses happy. I think if H. C. Frick knew he could be crushed into a red splotch by trying to get another ton a day, he'd probably given up a few million to make sure he got out alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. that's because they are union mines and require
supplies of water and oxegen stashes all over the mine . So in case
a collapse happens the miners can wait out a rescue .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Probably not PREVENT them, but Canada seems to have initiated safety precautions
that prevent death!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. How many injuries are there at wind and solar plants? I'm just wondering. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes. By promoting alternative sources of energy.
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC