Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill authorizing Army Corps water projects hits roadblock (Infrastructure...)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 02:24 PM
Original message
Bill authorizing Army Corps water projects hits roadblock (Infrastructure...)
Bill authorizing Army Corps water projects hits roadblock
By Darren Goode CongressDaily August 6, 2007

Senators left for the recess without acting on a conference report to reauthorize the Water Resources Development Act, though supporters expect to act soon after Congress reconvenes in September.

Sen. Russell Feingold, D-Wis., objected late Friday when Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., asked for unanimous consent to bring the conference report to the floor. The chamber had shortly before passed legislation on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act when Reid attempted to bring up the water resources bill.

The Senate is expected to approve the measure by more than the two-thirds support needed to override a threatened veto. The House last week approved it 381-40. Feingold opposes the conference report because he does not believe it goes far enough in changing how Army Corps of Engineers projects are reviewed and approved.

....
Feingold supported a Senate-passed bill that authorized nearly $14 billion in Army Corps water infrastructure projects and included language requiring independent reviews of projects that cost at least $40 million; projects requested by an affected governor or head of a federal agency or projects deemed controversial.


http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=37684&dcn=todaysnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYVet Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ok, let me get this straight...
Rather than have a bill that has changes to the approval process, 1 senator thinks we should not have a bill in place to fund needed construction of infrastructure because the changes are not enough to suit him?

Un-believable...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC