Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraqi Christians were safer under Saddam, says Vatican official

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 11:27 AM
Original message
Iraqi Christians were safer under Saddam, says Vatican official
Iraqi Christians were safer under Saddam, says Vatican official

By Carol Glatz
Catholic News Service

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- Although Iraq has a democratic government, Iraqi Christians were safer and had more protection under former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, said the future head of the Vatican's interreligious dialogue council.

During the buildup to the U.S.-led invasion in 2003, French Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, who will become head of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue Sept. 1, had criticized the U.S. government's plan of preventative war and said a unilateral war against Iraq would be a "crime against peace."

In a recent interview with the Italian magazine 30 Giorni, the cardinal said his early criticisms had been prophetic.

"The facts speak for themselves. Alienating the international community (with the U.S. push for war) was a mistake," he said in the magazine's Aug. 10 issue. A copy of the interview was released in advance to journalists.

He said an "unjust approach" was used to unseat Saddam from power, resulting in the mounting chaos in Iraq today.

"Power is in the hands of the strongest -- the Shiites -- and the country is sinking into a sectarian civil war (between Sunni and Shiite Muslims) in which not even Christians are spared," he said.

Christians, "paradoxically, were more protected under the dictatorship," he said.

http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0704487.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. I remember some surprise when I gave my unit's "playing card" briefing...
Edited on Tue Aug-07-07 11:31 AM by dmesg
...going over the list of the most wanted (the logic of assigning that to a buck sergeant seemed to be that since dmesg speaks Arabic he must be an expert on every question regarding Iraqi government and society): they had no idea the list would include women and Christians, particularly a Christian as highly ranked as Aziz (where the hell is Aziz now, anyways?). I tried to explain how Saddam was a Stalinist who was trying very hard to erase secular and ethnic distinctions in his society, and that he promoted women to high places to frustrate pan-Islamists, and that there would be hell to pay if after the invasion we didn't manage that question as carefully as he had. Too bad the SecDef wasn't saying that sort of thing, and was firing 3-stars who did...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The US media has done a great job keeping the American public uninformed? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. No, but according to the U.S. Christian War Cult, those people aren't really "Christians"
They haven't said the right things in the right order and pledged to fund more hate, torture and war in the name of Jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, and women had it better under Saddam too
unless you were Shiite, I suppose, since that was the group that was the main object of oppression under Saddam. But even if Saddam had nothing to do with it, Shiite women would have been oppressed by their own men since they are very conservative in their views of women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedz313 Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. .
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC