Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So. Who is taking credit for the downfall of "Communist China"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 07:27 AM
Original message
So. Who is taking credit for the downfall of "Communist China"?
Wait. . what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Raygun, posthumously
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I was thinking the history rewriters would try to credit Nixon..
(at least I wouldn't put it past them)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I just figured it would fit right in with their hero worship of Raygun
Edited on Mon Aug-06-07 07:47 AM by AtomicKitten
... regardless of the fact that it makes no sense at all.

Nixon is tainted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. C C C
Communist Corporate China
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. And that's different from the Mandarins, how?. . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. maybe this?




actually, i looked up mandarins and nope not much difference then and now..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well, it happened during Clinton's watch. So maybe he should get credit.
It was Nixon. He opened the door - everything else just followed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Who wants the credit??
I mean why would someone want to take credit for turning a pseudo-communist party worshipping despotism into a capitalist feudal state despotism?

It still is a despotism with atrocious human rights violations. Anyone 'taking credit' would be stupidly premature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'm unaware of the PRC's "downfall". The party ruling China when Carter officially recognized
is the same party in control of China today. Maybe you could credit Deng Xiaoping for liberalizing China's economy if that's what you mean by "downfall". Carter's official grant of recognition to the PRC in 1978 (after Nixon's diplomatic visit) opened the door to regular trade with China, and Deng Xiaoping transformed China to make the most of that opportunity. Although derecognizing Taiwan and recognizing the PRC as the rightful gov't of China preceded the explosion of trade between us, it is apparent that Deng let the Carter Administration know how he planned to change China, leading to the grant of recognition. Although Carter waded through Republican abuse for recognizing China and is to be credited with easing China's entrance into the world economy, the engine of this change was a little man in a Mao suit named Deng Xiaoping.

Not everything in the world good or bad is caused by Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. silly literalists. . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. not Lou Dobbs..
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
12. Don't You Mean "Red" China???
I recently heard Lou Doobies use that term...I felt like I was back in the 60's. Of course they were vanquished...didn't you see when they put Mao in a Box with some White Rice and Sweet & Sour Sauce? :sarcasm:

Anyone remember who was Nixon's first envoy to China?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. I BelieveThat Would be
Deng Xiaoping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC