Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Social networking and the end of"leadership"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 10:17 AM
Original message
Social networking and the end of"leadership"
Edited on Sat Aug-04-07 10:17 AM by undergroundpanther
Could Social Networking Bring the End of Leadership?
Suppose that all the politicians, business czars and celebrities of today had had access to blogs and social networking tools when they were teenagers, and that all the archives of local newspaper articles and crime blotters from that time were electronically available today.

If they were, what would we discover about these people? Would their 1960s and 1970s teenage rants be so outrageous that they would never have achieved elected office because their opponents would have thrown these indiscreet and half-formed thoughts back in their face, and humiliated them in the public eye? Would we know just what Bush said and did during his drunken and drug-addled youthful binges? Would we know for sure how his lies and daddy's money kept him out of any real military service, and out of jail when he went AWOL from the cozy arrangement daddy made for him in the air force?
http://blogs.salon.com/0002007/2007/08/02.html#a1940



Long ago abusers of power and trust, the exploiters of this country were scared by all the unwashed masses and immigrants gathering in the streets after they slaved at the sweatshops all day, partying, talking on their stoops, having brawls, sex, forming -- gasp -- unions and rebellions and having divergent opinions from the oppressors who were the rich elite robber barons, among other things ...

These elitist, rich thugs who think they have a divine entitlement of domination -- they never change. They wanted to stop this uncontrolled fraternizing, information sharing, and socializing, so they passed loiter laws, to keep the poor and working people from gathering in the streets and talking to one another unsupervised.
http://www.unknownnews.org/060131a-Panther.html


" They must find it difficult. .. .
Those who have taken authority as the truth,
rather than truth as the authority."

Gerald Massey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC