Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"In the end, we don't know what we don't know," re: Cheney's role in the Klamath River water policy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 06:24 PM
Original message
"In the end, we don't know what we don't know," re: Cheney's role in the Klamath River water policy
Watchdog Clears Cheney in Limited Probe
By MATTHEW DALY, Associated Press Writer

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

(07-31) 15:16 PDT WASHINGTON (AP) --

The Interior Department's inspector general didn't find political interference by Vice President Dick Cheney on a key environmental policy in part because investigators weren't looking for it, an Interior official said Tuesday.

A 2004 report by the inspector general found no basis for a claim by then-Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry that White House political advisers interfered in developing water policy in the Klamath River Basin in California and Oregon.

But investigators did not ask about Cheney — and no Interior employee volunteered information about him, said Mary Kendall, deputy Interior inspector general. A former high-ranking Interior official, Sue Ellen Wooldridge, told The Washington Post that Cheney contacted her on a regular basis in 2001 and 2002, when the Bush administration was reworking water policy for the drought-starved basin.

Wooldridge, who oversaw Klamath policy, never told investigators about her contacts with Cheney, Kendall said. And because investigators were focusing on White House political adviser Karl Rove — who was singled out in the Democratic complaint — they did not ask about Cheney, Kendall said.

"In the end, we don't know what we don't know," she told members of the House Natural Resources Committee at a hearing exploring Cheney's role in the Klamath.

more...
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/07/31/national/w151653D33.DTL&tsp=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Unknown unknowns. - a republicon crony speciality
Edited on Tue Jul-31-07 06:35 PM by SpiralHawk
"Smirk, sneer, smirk." - Dickie 'Five Military Deferments' Cheney*

* "One thing we republicon chickenhakwks do know is how to get beaucoup military deferments, Smirk, sneer, smirk." - Dickie Boy

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baby_mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. = "we don't know shit" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bullcrap.
Cheney and Senator Gordon Smith's involvement is very well documented.

http://www.oregonecology.com/2007/07/cheney-kills-salmon-for-gordon-smith.html

http://www.tsweekly.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1676&Itemid=71

http://www.earthjustice.org/our_work/buck_in_brief/cheney-and-the-klamath-fish-kill.html

http://www.loadedorygun.net/showDiary.do?diaryId=16

This is just another Bush Crime Family appointee.

Mark my words, this will be an issue in Gordon Smith's reelection campaign.

Big time.

They can't sweep all those dead fish under the rug.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He's just another lying republicon crony
Why do republicons HATE America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Hey
I've got local crabbers concerned about the crabbing areas that are the same as the wave energy buoys. There's still lots of room for talking, but I'm wondering what you know about filing as intervenors. Shouldn't that be done, regardless, just in case. It is true, if crab aren't taken from traditional habitat, then more predators will be attracte inland, and the entire fishery can change. We need to be considering this as we go forward.

I don't understand the intervenor process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I don't understand what you mean as it relates to the Klamath Fish Kill
The crabbing / wave energy thing is a whole 'nother topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I just noticed you is all
And as it relates to any environmental matter, wondered if you knew about the intervenor process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC