Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pentagon To Announce Continuation of 'Surge' Into 2008

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 10:08 AM
Original message
Pentagon To Announce Continuation of 'Surge' Into 2008
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Pentagon_to_announce_massive_continuation_of_0731.html

Pentagon to announce continuation of 'surge' into 2008

John Byrne and David Edwards
Published: Tuesday July 31, 2007

The Pentagon is expected to announce this morning that 20,000 troops will be rotated into Iraq at the end of this year to extend President Bush's troop "surge" through next spring, CNN reported Tuesday.

"They may have to reach down into the National Guard or Army reserve" to maintain the surge, CNN Pentagon correspondent Barbara Starr said, and may extend tours of duty to maintain the surge past the spring of 2008 in what was described as a "worst case scenario."

Military commanders began to expect earlier this year that the surge would have to be extended into next year. In an article that appeared in the Washington Post in May, Lt. Gen. Raymond T. Odierno, who manages day-to-day operations in Iraq, said the surge needed to last "through the beginning of next year, for sure." Odierno noted at the time that new regulations extending tours of duty to 15 months would allow for the surge to last through spring 2008.

"These will be the replacement troops on a 15 month tour of duty, as the troops that are there finish up their tours of duty," Starr said on CNN Tuesday. "Reading between the lines, what is interesting here, is these troops will allow the Pentagon to maintain the status quo."

Starr said troop shortages will hamper efforts to maintain the increased troop presence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. But... but... but... "It never was about staying the course!" said the...
lying m'fer in the peoples' house.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. what is up is down, and what is black is white, etc. etc in relation to what the WH says !!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. We all knew this was coming down thw pike...
War supporters critics O'Hanlon & Pollack are saying the surge is working!:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
codepinkdc Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Disgusting!
What! How can they keep acting like this surge is working when everyone, including some REPUBLICAN senators admit that it is a total failure?!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. what ever happened to Sept?------got moved to NOV, The April, 2008, now
sometime in 09.






just announce..... ummm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. Dishonest to keep calling it a "surge"--a sustained increase in our
military presence over a year or more is not a "surge". It's a permanent force-numbers policy. And the focus on whether or not it's "working" is stupid--what will ultimately be the end result? We're a crutch, at best, right now. The longer we prop them up, the more dependent they'll get on us. Why should the Iraqis "step up" when we keep telegraphing our willingness to shed our own blood for them indefinitely? I'm not blaming them, I'm pointing to the nature of their situation--they don't seem to have faith in the puppet-populated Iraq government, so they're more interested in the advancement and empowerment of their respective tribes. As long as we keep doing the dirty work of fighting and refereeing the various factions, why would they want to stop us? We kill Sunnis, the Shia cheer. We take on Shia militias, the Sunnis cheer. Now we're going to help Turkey take on the Kurd guerrillas--there's just no end to this. No matter though--it's for the next Prez to absorb the failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC