Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is Alcohol NOT included in the proposed tax for uninsured children?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:25 PM
Original message
Why is Alcohol NOT included in the proposed tax for uninsured children?
Fine, tax tobacco but why stop there? Why not Alcohol? Why not the food industry? :shrug:

Also, the tax is an obvious incentive to get people to quit smoking. If it indeed works and everyone quits, where will the funds then come from?

You tell me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why are you picking on ME????
Yes I smoke, and I drink beer! Why should "I" have to pay for everything that's deemed good?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think the whole concept is ridiculous. Tax McDonald's, Tax RJ Reynolds, Tax the Corn Lobby....
I'm so sick of the average citizen having to foot the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. How is that the average citizen?
Edited on Thu Jul-26-07 02:43 PM by depakid
Those are "sin taxes" that people have a choice whether to pay (by consuming) or not pay, by refraining.

In economic terms, they serve a dual purpose, to discourage unhealthy behavior- and to fund programs by assigning a portion of the funds to externalities that are caused by those businesses (and their customers).

A single payer system would likely be funded to some extent in the same sorts of ways.

Is it regressive- yep, and that's an argument that also can be made, depending how the taxes are assigned and collected.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Alcohol abuse is involved in a lot of health problems
as is tobacco and smoking. Alcohol abuse is also involved in a lot of crime and abuse of children. Note I don't say that alcohol causes these things. Increasing the tax on alcohol to moderate use is a good idea. We all pay for the police and health care costs of alcohol abuse.

If you don't abuse alcohol, an additional tax won't cost you that much.

Food should not be taxed. It is a necessity. Alcohol and tobacco are not necessities. Anyone who thinks they are has a problem and should see a doctor.

After all, we pay a tax to on our cars and on gasoline. We need those items more than alcohol or tobacco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Because it's always "safe" to levy "sin-taxes" on the group that's currently out of favor
and goodness knows, our legislators would never just do something because it's the decent thing to do.

This is what always happens when they feel as if they dare not raise taxes to pay for something that's needed. They think that whenever something needs to be funded, the money to pay for it simply MUST come from some other program. At the same time they go on and on about how our economy is expanding, but Ole Uncle Sam seems to be living on a very fixed income when it comes to infrastructure and socially necessary programs.

:grr:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnb Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Too many drinkers
Smokers are enough of a minority in this country now that you can get away with it without losing votes. Too many drinkers in America for that to be a safe move.

Besides, they know this will not cause many people to quit smoking...they know they are guaranteed funding, again from a small group no one gives a damn about.

And yes, I am a smoker. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Fetal Alcohol Syndrome - yeah, that ain't a problem
Drunk driving

alcoholism

domestic violence.

Nah, leave the boozers alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. FAS is not a big problem in the vast majority of the country
In order to give a kid FAS their mommy has to drink a lot, like Charles Bukowski amounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. OH get real! Yes there are some individuals who are stupid!
LAWS won't ever change that! There are also lots of responsible smokers & drinkers!

I have 2 sons. I quit smoking and drinking as soon as I got pregnant! Both of those boys are adults today. One is 42 the other 39! They have NO problems and both quite smoking quite a few years ago.

Driving drunk is ALREADY illegal! So is cocain and meth, but that doesn't seem to stop some people from using, does it?

And you reference domestic violence. Violence is a mental problem with some people. Yes, alcohol aggrivates it, but is sure is NOT the cause!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. You get real!
:nuke:

Just because you're responsible doesn't mean everyone else is.

Get real! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yes you're right, but you can't legislate OR TAX morality or responsibility. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Alcohol, in reasonable amounts, is good for you.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes, but if abused - which it often is - it can cause serious health problems too.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Agreed.
I abhor sin taxes because, eventually, you tax it so much people either quit buying it and/or purchase it through the black market or online (sans taxes) and then the funds aren't available for whatever they were intended for.

It's a stupid idea.

We should care enough about peoples' health, especially children, that we include EVERYONE in the tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think they should tax pot--after they legalize it.
I'm patriotic enough to shoulder that burden.

:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapere aude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. I am a non smoker but I appose taxes on cigarettes to raise money for non smoking
issues.

If the issue is a good one we all should pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringEmOn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's easier to collect sin tax than to cut the Pentagon budget or to rescind tax cuts for the
have-mores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Yea that's right, but the other pot is SO MUCH BIGGER!!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Alcohol and Cigarettes CAUSE Major Health Problems
Esp. for the poor. So, they should be taxed in order to pay for the health care of the poor.

When Alcohol and Cigarettes are not taxed, then we pay for the health care of the people who use these products and develop the inevitable health problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
18. Because tobacco is produced in relatively few areas
Tax tobacco and you'll piss off people in Louisville, Richmond and Winston-Salem. Tax alcohol and you'll annoy folks in countless congressional districts: Several major beer manufacturers and God knows how many distilleries

The fact that is possible to use alcohol safely but the same can't be said for tobacco also plays a role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. Because alcohol is good for you.
:shrug:..

Driving is more FUN when you're drunk
Kids behave better when Dad's lit up
Wives pay attention to a drunk husband
Drinking makes potential lovers more attractive
People dance better when they are drunk
Drunking excuses bad behavior

did I leave any out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. The authors of the bill are alcoholics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC