Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Plame Lawyer: Team Plans To Take Case To U.S. Supreme Court If U.S. Court Of Appeals Rejects Appeal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 06:08 AM
Original message
Plame Lawyer: Team Plans To Take Case To U.S. Supreme Court If U.S. Court Of Appeals Rejects Appeal
http://www.mercurynews.com/peninsula/ci_6457748?nclick_check=1

Burlingame lawyer pursuing Plame suit
He's part of team behind outed CIA agent

By Aaron Kinney
MediaNews
Article Launched: 07/25/2007 01:33:43 AM PDT

A legal team that includes Burlingame attorney Joe Cotchett is moving ahead with a civil suit on behalf of outed CIA agent Valerie Plame and her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson IV, following a setback in federal court. The couple have filed an appeal of a decision last week by U.S. District Judge John Bates that dismissed their suit against four Bush Administration officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney and his former chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby.

- snip -

Wilson and Plame filed their appeal the next day. They are pursuing four constitutional claims, which assert that their First Amendment and Fifth Amendment rights were violated, and one common-law tort claim alleging the public disclosure of private facts.

- snip -

Cotchett, a renowned trial attorney and one-third of the couple's legal team, said Tuesday that Bates "read the law too narrowly." "The argument we make is that their conduct was illegal, because it's an illegal act to out a CIA agent," Cotchett said of the defendants. "He never really reached that issue."

- snip -

The Intelligence Identities Protection Act, Chemerinsky said, is a criminal statute, and "no court has ever said that a criminal statute precludes a civil suit for money damages." Cotchett said his legal team plans to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court if the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit turns down its appeal.

MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. I will continue to support the effort.
Others should as well.
http://www.wilsonsupport.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. A kick for those who care about justice.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. K & R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Off to the Greatest ye shall go....
and a great send off to boot...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sojourner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. and who thinks THAT's going to do any good?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC