|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:02 PM Original message |
Simple Question: Why did Sheehan feel it necessary to storm Conyer's office and insist he Impeach? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. Because he had basically promised to impeach bushco |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Need more details... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Pelosi never put it back ON the table |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MichiganVote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. And these are all just assumptions. Assumptions got us into this mess in the 1st place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I dunno, I think p2bl pretty much covered the board |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MichiganVote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Could be but you don't know and neither do I. And who asked you anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 08:01 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. You're rude. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MichiganVote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 08:11 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Back at you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 08:15 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. The rudest thing I've done in this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 08:18 PM Response to Reply #14 |
26. They weren't "assumptions" anyway.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 08:39 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. I was actually interested in hearing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. (just a side note) HR Res 333 is a motion to impeach Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:12 PM Original message |
If Sheehan had the power to make Conyers do something or not do it, Conyers would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
30. I agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MichiganVote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
3. you would have to ask that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:15 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Why would Sheehan protest Conyers if Conyers said he would impeach (with 3 more votes)? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. I say don't jump to conclusions. Cindy, David Swansan, Conyers, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MichiganVote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:14 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. B/c some of those who protested believed that a politician made promises to them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
4. Following bad advice for sure! She has been listening to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 06:23 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Deleted sub-thread |
GeorgeGist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
10. simple answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
13. Everyone's talking about it, aren't they? - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
15. Because she is a terrible strategist and a publicity hound. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:38 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. the people hanging onto her want the attention. Her capacity for Discrimination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:58 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Good point, her "disciples" are far worse. I just think she's misguided... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
16. Politicians make promises and go back on them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
18. Somebody had to do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
20. Conyers never said he'd move to impeach Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 08:25 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. Thank you. That is what I needed. There is too much disinfo going around here now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 08:46 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. Now stop it with all that logic and reasonable analysis and stuff. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 10:16 PM Response to Reply #20 |
31. Yes he did say he would impeach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 10:57 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. should have qualified with ". . .since Pelosi issued her "off the table" edict." (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 11:01 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. January 2007 was AFTER Pelosi took it off the table |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 11:03 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. reference?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 11:05 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. I was there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 02:06 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. He said "we can fire them" at that rally, and later said he meant "vote them out". . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
21. Because if you heard the news today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
32. They actually were touring members of the House Judiciary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:30 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC