Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WAPO: Hillary Has Boobs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 01:15 PM
Original message
WAPO: Hillary Has Boobs
Edited on Fri Jul-20-07 01:20 PM by kpete
This Just In…

By Christy Hardin Smith on Fri Jul 20, 2007 at 09:59 am
http://www.firedoglake.com/category/womens-issues/
According to Robin Givhan of the WaPo, Hillary Clinton is a woman. And…wait for it…as a result of being female, she has breasts which result in…gasp…cleavage. This may be a new low in infotainment non-reportage:

There was cleavage on display Wednesday afternoon on C-SPAN2. It belonged to Sen. Hillary Clinton.

She was talking on the Senate floor about the burdensome cost of higher education. She was wearing a rose-colored blazer over a black top. The neckline sat low on her chest and had a subtle V-shape. The cleavage registered after only a quick glance. No scrunch-faced scrutiny was necessary. There wasn’t an unseemly amount of cleavage showing, but there it was. Undeniable.

It was startling to see that small acknowledgment of sexuality and femininity peeking out of the conservative — aesthetically speaking — environment of Congress. After all, it wasn’t until the early ’90s that women were even allowed to wear pants on the Senate floor. It was even more surprising to note that it was coming from Clinton, someone who has been so publicly ambivalent about style, image and the burdens of both.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/19/AR2007071902668_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's the photo with the wapo article
For some reason firedoglake linked to the printer-friendly version of the article, which didn't have the photo.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/19/AR2007071902668.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mindfulNJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. My GOD
The shameless HUSSY!





What the hell?!:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not only that...
but I understand that she had wild, passionate sex with Bill Clinton often, sometimes two or three times a day at certain points in their relationship!

"My position may vary, but I am always looking for successful mutual resolutions at the appropriate time!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Women have breasts
How shocking.

I hear Bush has already said he will fire and order the
arrest of the felon who leaked the information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. OMFG! You mean... (gasp!) ... she's a MAMMAL??!?!?
When will people get over this, fer krissakes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. Givhan was a wee bit creepy
"The cleavage, however, is an exceptional kind of flourish. After all, it's not a matter of what she's wearing but rather what's being revealed. It's tempting to say that the cleavage stirs the same kind of discomfort that might be churned up after spotting Rudy Giuliani with his shirt unbuttoned just a smidge too far. No one wants to see that. But really, it was more like catching a man with his fly unzipped. Just look away!"

"With Clinton, there was the sense that you were catching a surreptitious glimpse at something private. You were intruding -- being a voyeur."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Me too! Me too! It's FRIDAY YA BASTIDS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. wow what was their first clue?
must be a slow news day for those guys at the washington post, too bad we don't have a war or a national health care crisis something they could be reporting on, on the other hand, now that we have reached utopia there is nothing left for us but to read breathless reports on democrat's clothes, hair, make-up, and now, BOOBIES!

hide the children, i'm going to post a picture of two BOOBIES right here, now can i get a high paid job at the wapo?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Can we discuss McConnell's WAY too tight collar, too?
Edited on Fri Jul-20-07 02:37 PM by blondeatlast
He looked like his air-filled head was being forced through a vise-grip. He always looks that way, of course, but it was pronounced during the RRRepublican obstructionist filibuster.

Which explains a lot, when you think about it--but it was still awful to witness.

http://images.google.com/url?q=http://www.foxnews.com/images/262858/0_62_mcconnell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC