Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Listen Up: Clear Channel's Accused of Payola. Again.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 06:19 PM
Original message
Listen Up: Clear Channel's Accused of Payola. Again.
Listen Up: Clear Channel's Accused of Payola. Again.
Fri Jul 13, 2007 at 04:05:51 PM

As Clear Channel owns five major stations in the Dallas market -- among them, KHKS-FM (KISS 106, home to Kidd Kraddick), KDGE-FM (102.1, Your Alleged New Rock Alternative) and KZPS-FM (92.5, the recently rechristened Lone Star) -- this certainly qualifies as local news. And if you're an unsigned local artist trying to get heard on a local Clear Channel station, well, this directly affects you.

Because, see, the Washington, D.C.-based Future of Music Coalition today filed a formal complaint with the Federal Communications Commission, in which the FMC basically accuses San Antonio-based Clear Channel of payola. Again.

Why? Well, it's a long story that begins with an April settlement reached between the FCC and Clear Channel, CBS Radio, Citadel and Entercom. The FCC had claimed that all four media conglomerates were engaged in payola, which is to say, of course, they were taking money and other goodies from record companies to air those labels' songs. The four agreed to pay a $12.5 million fine -- and, in a separate deal, agreed to air 4,200 hours of music from independent artists not signed to major labels.

Only, the FMC claims today, Clear Channel said it would only live up to the second half of the bargain if those local and independent musicians waved their rights to collect royalties. Clear Channel would play the songs, or at least consider those songs indie artists uploaded directly to a Clear Channel Web site, but only if the conglomerate could play them gratis -- and for as long as its stations wanted. And Clear Channel could do anything it liked with those songs. So says language from a contract FMC provides today in its complaint:

You grant to Clear Channel the royalty-free non-exclusive right and license, in perpetuity (unless terminated earlier by You or Clear Channel as set forth below), to use, copy, modify, adapt, translate, publicly perform, digitally perform, publicly display and distribute any sound recordings, compositions, pictures, videos, song lyrics, still images ...

http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2007/07/listen_up_clear_channels_accus.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC