Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

*** Official House Judiciary The Repukes are crazy *** Thread #3

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:04 AM
Original message
*** Official House Judiciary The Repukes are crazy *** Thread #3
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 10:06 AM by MiniMe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kicked, Recommended, and in agreement - these Republicans are NUTS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Down to the last one, they don't want the truth to get out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Trent Franks R-AZ kissing up to Tom Feeney...holy shit what a whimp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. "We will be embarassed"
NO SHIT!
The GoP Will be embarrassed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. My guess is they'll be embarrassed because this will open
up the can of worms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. I am embarrassed when these repukes are allowed to even speak
...and what they have to say!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. The voice of experience
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Jeez, make Cannon shut up, isn't his time up yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. One word for these Republican scumbags: Shameless.
Well I guess two words if you count scumbags. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Here's another: TRAITORS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. The Z crew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. how true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's Gen. Tommy Franks' fault!
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 10:12 AM by JohnnyLib2

Ooooops, wrong forum. Please ignore, just like other things * says today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
13. Re-edit: Yes~~~Bush just called Al-Q. "thugs who want chaos to instill fear."
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 10:20 AM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #13
32. OMG is he talking about himself, is he cracking at the podium yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #32
61. He's now on the straw-man of "some" saying Iraq can't self-govern, that Iraqis
don't even LIKE Liberty.
But HE knows it's a Universal right, blah, blah.

Seriously, this Press Conf. is a CLASSIC, and one we'll all need to read the transcript of, and/or re-watch.

If there were no Hearing right now, our heads would be exploding at Bush! And his jaw was working over-time, also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. Okay, I just got here. I know she was a no show, but what about inherent contempt??? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Sounds like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. They're working on it! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #14
25. They're back-and-forthing before voting on a contempt citation I think. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
16. Conyers:
such a pleasant voice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
17. Conyers: If we don't issue this subpeona, nobody will have to testify before
the committee again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dubyaD40web Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
40. One of the greatest quotes ever.
He is soooo right. They must do something or Congress will be powerless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:21 AM
Original message
that would suit repukes fine! ISSUE THE DAMN SUBPOENAS NOW! Stop screwin around
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 10:22 AM by wordpix
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
19. John Conyers is so great!
I love this man!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
21. Short but powerful
"If we do not enforce this subpoena, no one will take them seriously again"
may the future generation forgive us all

-A patriot in exile

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
162. "IF WE DO NOT ENFORCE THIS SUBPOENA, NO ONE WILL TAKE THEM SERIOUSLY AGAIN"
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 03:39 PM by Duppers
Hope you don't mind my putting that in caps, comtec. It IS INDEED most powerful statement, as you said.

And so IF contempt charges were brought, they'd have little chance of success, as it seems....

> ...

The citation would first be debated and voted upon by the full Judiciary Committee. If approved, it then would go to the full House where it would be debated and require a majority for approval.

The House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, Democrat of California, would then refer the matter to the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, "whose duty it shall be to bring the matter before the grand jury for its action," according to the law. The man who holds that job is a Bush appointee, Jeff Taylor.

Legal scholars said the issue of Ms. Miers' immunity is far from clear-cut. No president has gone as far as mounting a court fight to keep his aides from testifying on Capitol Hill.


http://www.nysun.com/article/58349?page_no=4


BUT THEY SHOULD GO FOR IT ANYWAY, IMHO!


:grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
22. Everytime the mike stand moves I think some Republican boor is burping
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. I thought it was my stomach turning when the Repubs speak.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
23. "It happened yesterday."
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Best statement of the day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #26
41. Totally agree! Major smackdown. Hooray for Conyers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #23
86. more info on this, please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
24. keep us cube rats informed
sounds unbelieveable, they got to get these traitors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
28. That dumb republican just made Conyer's point for him! LOL
He made the point that no president has ever done this before. LOL

What a dumb ass.

Then Conyers responds that it happened yesterday as well. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
29. Feeny: I don't think it ever happened before.
That's because whenever someone was subpoenaed, they SHOWED THE F*CK UP!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Exactly. The dumbass proved Conyer's point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
30. ok what order are they talking about?
Im late...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. Bush ordering people to ignore subpoenas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. Inherent Contempt Citation
Seargant at Arms can arrest her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #30
39. in short,
the dems say this is BS, we want that bitch here NOW!
the gopers are saying waaahhh we don't wanna, it'll make us look baaaaddd
that's the really short of it. otherwise read the first two posts :)

-A patriot in exile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
33. The Repukes are Anti-America Ass Kissing Fools!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
35. Please alert the mods for control over these threads
We have two official 1's, two official 2's and none of them are locked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. Minime posted this one first...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. Absolutely, please keep the thread titles the same though
That's how I got into trouble lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #38
44. None of the others are locked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #35
45. No. Locking them blocks the development of discussions
taking place in sub-threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:20 AM
Original message
But those of us in rural areas with dial-up can't handle large threads
the time for them to build becomes impossible - both to follow coherently or participate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
74. We always lock the threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
37. The republicans on this committee
are all engaged in the criminal enterprise of a cover up.. none of them have a shred of integrity. Why bother with "comity" when all this jackbooted thugs are just water carrying tools for the White House?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #37
48. The Dem is hitting Bush on the head (Bush LIED)--says not to trust him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
43. They are *not* crazy...
...evil fucks, but not crazy.

They are doing their best to build the executive's case.

Absolute assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. Exactly. They know exactly what they are doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #47
111. trying to retain power & carry it onto the next repuke pResident but
the Dems in Congress finally have the power we gave them. Just USE IT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
46. Conyers stated that if this committee does not follow through with the Contempt of Congress order
....that no future witness will ever need to appear before any congressional hearing. Tom Feeney jumped in with a question that this would not be the case and he could not recall it ever happening...to which Conyers responded "...it happened yesterday before the Senate committee!" The audience laughed in agreement and Feeney curled back into his fetal position...shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #46
119. ahahahahah, thanks from a cube rat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #119
160. You are welcome, but then I was called away a second time and
....when I returned the Conyers motion to issue a citation to the White House and Meyers for being in Contempt of Congress seemed to disappear off the table. I just learned that this was the case because part of the discussions between Cannon and Linda Sanchez were about Meyers having the opportunity to still respond to the subpoena over the next five days. If she fails to appear by then or fails to give proper precedent for not appearing then the committee can act on the motion. I hope I got that correct, it can to me from a second party source as I apparently missed that part of the committee discussions. So, I guess I'll be watching the rerun this evening just for that portion so I hear this ruling for myself. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
49. Watt laying out all of Bush's lies and why he doesn't trust him.
Even brought up "Mission Accomplished" :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #49
55. and doing an EXCELLENT job at it...!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #49
70. Arrrgghhh!
Shut that man up! Unparliamentary my big old ass! I got a word for you Mr. Cannon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:29 AM
Original message
Bush turning back to the podium after leaving: "this is not the new me, this is an aberration"
:rofl: an abomination is more like it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
50. Watt calls Bush a liar. You go!
"This is a president who I have trouble giving any presumptions to anymore."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #50
56. Cannon AGAIN! Make him be quiet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #50
78. Cannon calls Watt "unparliamentary." How ironic!
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 10:22 AM by RufusTFirefly
Isn't he the one who just referred to Sanchez as "Chief Justice Sanchez"? Talk about innuendo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
51. Parliamentary Question: Who Will Be Sent To Lock Her Up or Bring Her Forward?
I believe the Capital Police only have jurisdiction on Capital grounds. Park police? FBI?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #51
155. Dog catcher?
Not to insult dogs or anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #51
161. I believe the Seargeant at Arms teams up with local police to go get
here and bring her back to congress for questioning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greylyn58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
52. Go Mel Go
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 10:20 AM by Greylyn58
You are doing Charlotte proud!!!!






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
53. Mel Watt with a great litany as why we cannot trust what Shrub has to say!!!! Yeah!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:20 AM
Original message
cannon objecting to the truth!

mel watt: "I think we know what we are dealing with here: an inferior president who thinks that he's above the law."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
54. Watt is kicking some ass. Going down the Bush BS laundry list.
Everything from outing Plame to Mission Accomplished on the carrier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #54
58. Waaaah "he called the President a liar"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:20 AM
Original message
waaahhh He called bush a liar
YOU GO WATTS!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #54
66. Mr. Cannon is such an ass....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #66
96. Did he care when Dan Burton called Clinton a scumbag?
Didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
57. Wow...Watts...smackdown of the day!!!
That's a great soundbyte for the day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #57
91. It made Cannon CRY!
After Cannon has wasted umpteen minutes of our time trashing Bill Clinton and issuing all sorts of bullshit screeds against democrats, he wants Mel Watts "unparlamaintary" words taken down, and he keeps interrupting Sanchez DEMANDING that Mel Watts' words be removed from the record.

What a fat fuck crybaby douche bag asshole hypocritical turd.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #57
147. what was the soundbyte?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
59. That was just too much for the fascists so they had to cry about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #59
81. It would take too much time to go back into the Congressional record during Clinton's
term and find how many times the Cons called Clinton a liar. In fact, didn't they Impeach him for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #81
126. Don't they have 5 days to add that little fact to the record? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
60. ROFL!!! Mel Watt running down the list of things including outing Valerie Plame
"Sticking his thumb in our eye and saying..." Cannon cuts in

Wants his words taken down. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
62. a Repug objected says NOT to call Bush a LIER !! te he
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:21 AM
Original message
ha ha-- Cannon saying can not bush a lier and wants the record to be taken down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
85. The chair has ruled that Cannon is an idiot. Cannon wants a recorded vote. HA HA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
63. Cannon calls parlimentary procedure to say Shrub cannot be called a liar. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #63
68. Boo f'ing hoo.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #63
89. Haha Cannon...so desperate
and so transparently a partisan dick. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
64. "We have an imperial president who thinks he's above the law."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #64
150. all right! Give it to those criminals!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
65. "I think the American people know what we're dealing with...
..an imperial President."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #65
76. Sanchez lets words stand!
LMAO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddhamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
67. Bravo Watt! Thank you!
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 10:21 AM by buddhamama
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
69. "This is not parliamentary!!!!" STFU whiner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #69
75. Kennedy looks amused! haha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
71. Mel Watts is winning lots and lots of points with me today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
72. He is a LIAR
rethugs can't stand the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
73. Someone call the Wahhhmbulance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #73
77. I INSIST the words be taken down waaaaaaah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #77
82. Voted down
Bush is a LIAR. Deal with it you loose Canon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #77
88. "I want a recorded vote" on who likes MEANIE WORDS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #88
115. He's going to be doing this for every last vote, I bet
My roommate was just snapping his fingers to the beat of the vote.

Time to consider the subpoena to the RNC! Here we go... this ought to be good!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #77
90. waaaaaahhhhhhh poor republcans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #77
94. Thank you, Zoe!!! She needed a little help from the Dems
Now they want a roll call vote so they can shout "NO!" in lockstep. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #73
84. ROTFLMFAO!!!!!
That's the best one I've heard so far!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
79. STF, Cannon. "Rule of law" and the words used by GOP during the Clinton
era are the same that Watt just used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #79
116. They called Clinton a liar day after day and impeached him for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
80. Cool! The gentleman's words were harsh but not unparlimentiary and will not be taken down. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #80
87. Bless her heart, she has to sit right next to Cannon.... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #87
102. He looks like he'd be pretty
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 10:24 AM by Moochy
gassy... :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #87
104. She's a better woman then I
I would have pinched his head off by now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #80
97. this is a bunch of BS
rethugs think that they can get away with anything. A waste of time on a recorded vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #80
152. they were harsh but true so STFU, repuke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
83. Mel Watt, D-NC: "Yesterday was the last insult"....
"I can't give Bush the presumption anymore.... he's the same president who has lied to Congress and the American people about the reasons for going to war.... he's the same president who revealed a CIA officer's identity and then turned around and lied about his reasons for doing it.... the same pres who claimed the mission was done on an aircraft carrier.... this pres is sticking his thumb in our eye..."



Interrupted by thug..... asked that Watt's words be taken down... unparliamentary words....
WE have *rules of decorum*...I insist that his words be taken down!

Shut up. Just Shut up, you monsters.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #83
93. This is unbelievable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #93
103. why do they keep letting this man interrupt everyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:24 AM
Original message
The Dem Chair has WON---take that you Repugs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #83
108. I had to step away for five minutes thanks for this track on what Watts
had to say, sorry I missed it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
92. Taking a vote on Sanchez's decision. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
95. can we all agree to call cannons office and tell him how much we can not stand him
and how he himself is trying to destroy our democracy and we do not appreciate it!!
202 225 3121

i am calling now..i want that fuck to know how much i despise what he is doing and that i know he is carrying the water of an illegal, lying , out of control white house!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #95
121. They don't want to get at the truth
their party is more important than justic and truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #121
157. I do know that..now we need to let them know we know that!! and we are mad as hell and not taking it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
98. GO AWAY CANNON
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilber_Stool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
99. This is turning into
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 10:29 AM by Wilber_Stool
a pretty good show. I'm glad I stayed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
100. 6-5 Mel Watts words stand on record!!!!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #100
120. Great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
101. Chair rules Watt "harsh but not unparlimentary" - - GOPer demands roll call vote
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 10:24 AM by AlGore-08.com
On tabling his challenge to the chair's ruling...

The motion tabled
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
105. Mel Watt is my representative
:D :bounce: :headbang: :woohoo: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #105
107. Awesome. He did you well today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #105
112. Call that man and thank him for me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #105
117. He was spectacular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #105
118. Lucky you! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greylyn58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #105
141. I live in Charlotte
but unfortunately, I have Sue Myrick for my rep. Ugh!!!! I wish I lived in Mel's district!!

He was incredible!!!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #141
156. I know. Sue Sucks!
Wasn't she supposed to make us invincible. I sure don't fell like that. The repukes and shrubs war has decimated our proud army to the breaking point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greylyn58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #156
158. She makes me insane
I have voted against her since she ran for this position, but unfortunately she is ensconced with the richies in this district in Charlotte.

UGH!!!





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
106. She needs to make this Cannon idiot stop interrupting her!!!!!
Damn, I've got smoke comin' out my ears!

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #106
146. i just called Cannons office and let them have it!! i even called hm a fat pig!!
i was so mad at that asshole... i got a little angry on the phone@!

just a little..

:nuke: :grr: :nuke: :grr: :nuke: :grr: :yoiks: :yoiks: :yoiks:

why M. etheridge song keep going through my head when i see this kind of behaviour ..i just don't know!!

lol...

i am not an island ,..i am not alone...I need to move ..........i need to wake up..

watch out congress i am on a roll!!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
109. Someone send Cannon a pacifier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #109
122. Perhaps we should all send him one
As a gift, of course! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
110. WOOT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
113. Note to Republicans - Eat Shit and Die.
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
114. Cannon wants Watts (Dems) words taken off the record. but Dems ruled in
favor of Watts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greylyn58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
123. Canon is just trying to
bog down this hearing with crap simply because he didn't like the truth being spoke about the Commander -n- Thief!!!

Trying to side track the hearing.

BOOO HOOO!!! Jerk!!!





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
124. What happen was there no ruling on Miers held in contempt?
I missed something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #124
135. Did they table it?
I'm so confused
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
125. So---what about HARRIET?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:27 AM
Original message
Coming up now n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #125
128. ?????
I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #125
134. good question. is that going to be done last?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
127. Now a motion for subpoenas on RNC communications...
RNC has refused to comply
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
129. Has Sanchez forgot about Miers?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:29 AM
Original message
Don't know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
130. I believe that Mr Cannon's attitiude indicates he suffers from a
common Repub Malady...Diaper Rash!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
131. new thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
132. OMG~~~CANNON again! "Why are we here? Why are we asking for an EP confrontation?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
133. These threads are too long and need to be locked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
136. Should we start a new thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #136
142. Yes but the mods don't lock them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #142
159. Well, I was going to, but the hearing ended
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 11:23 AM by MiniMe
And I think Helderheid did it.

Thanks IChing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
137. Cannon now trying to make the argument that the RNC is protected by executive privilege
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
138. Cannon:s verbal vomit!
"no real evidence of WH wrongdoing"

"why should we bother to try in order to create another partisan spectacle"

called it a charade...

what a shitbag...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
139. Cannon: No evidence of wrongdoing.
Leave this charade behind.


Cannon: BLOW IT OUT YOUR ASS!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
140. WOW WOW!!
the truth hurts doesn't it? you fucking repigs!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
143. new thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
144. Hearing Adjourned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
145. Let's see the rePukes try to sidetrack this subpoena!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
148. AMAZING!! Bush stopped his PC at THE EXACT SAME TIME! No lie!
Rambled throughout the ENTIRE thing, about al-Qaeda, then, as this Hearing ended, abruptly turned and walked off!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
149. Sounds like the repukes filibustered to motion to issue a Contempt Notice
....to Harriet Meyers and also the White House...did I miss that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
151. Who is the shithead cspan announcer?
At the end of the hearings, he said, "By the way, the President order Harriet Miers not to appear before the committee on the basis of executive privilege. Executive privilege gives Ms. Miers the absolute right not to testify before the committee".

Grrrrr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #151
153. She is not a member of the administration. she is a private citizen.
bush has no right ordering any private citizen to commit a criminal act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #151
154. Rep Cannon on obstruction of justice by the president:
From:

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/impeachment/trial/cannon_1-15.html

Some excerpts:

John Locke once said, "Wherever law ends, tyranny begins."

To that, Roosevelt added, "No man is above the law and no man is below it; nor do we ask any man's permission when we require him to obey it. Obedience to the law is demanded as a right; not as a favor."
...

Section 1503 deems it criminal to use force or threats, or to otherwise act corruptly, in order to influence, obstruct or impede the due administration of justice.

...

For the government to prove the crime of witness tampering, it must prove that the defendant acted with the intent to cause one of several results:

* The defendant can be convicted if he acted to influence, delay or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; or
* The defendant can be convicted if he acted to cause another person to withhold an object from an official proceeding.

In the case before us, the evidence proves that the President endeavored to cause both of these results on several occasions.

And, the government may show intent on the part of the defendant in several ways:

* It may prove the use of intimidation, physical force or threats, or
* It may prove intent by showing the use of corrupt persuasion or misleading conduct.


Oh yeah, I forgot to mention which President. This was when Rep. Cannon was one of the so-called "House Managers" during the Clinton impeachment. He was not so adamant about executive privilege at that time, strangely enough...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC