Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP Sen. Gordon Smith calls war in Iraq 'insane'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 08:51 AM
Original message
GOP Sen. Gordon Smith calls war in Iraq 'insane'
GOP Sen. Gordon Smith calls war in Iraq 'insane'
David Edwards and Muriel Kane
Published: Tuesday July 10, 2007


Fox News, reporting Tuesday on the increasing number of Republicans in Congress criticizing the Iraq War, interviewed Senator Gordon Smith (R-OR), cosponsor of a resolution for withdrawal.

Smith is known for a speech last December in which he stated, "I, for one, am at the end of my rope when it comes to supporting a policy that has our soldiers patrolling the same streets in the same way, being blown up by the same bombs day after day. That is absurd. It may even be criminal."

Smith told Fox, "If I could do anything over, I would – in that speech I gave – I would replace the word 'criminal' with the word 'insane.'" He suggested that the "surge" might have had a chance of working four years ago, but said, "On my numerous visits to Iraq ... each time I go, the government seems more and more dysfunctional. And all we're doing is depending on them to step up and govern."

Smith went on to explain the legislation he is sponsoring, saying, "There's nothing in this amendment that says we withdraw from the war on terror." When Fox host Shepard Smith pressed him on whether there might be a civil war in Iraq that is indistinguishable from the war on terror, the senator denied both points. "It may become a full-blown civil war," he acknowledged, "but the point is, it's not ours, it's theirs. It's not something we can win. ... I'm just tired of American kids dying for that."


more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ishoutandscream2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is he up for reelection?
I didn't see anything about that in the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Akoto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I believe he is (reelected in '02, 6-year terms), but ...
That really makes no difference to me. If it gets the troops out of Iraq, I'll take his help. We need some Republican support to make that happen in a way that can't be stopped.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anitar1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Gordy is up for reelection next year.
We are hoping to clean his plow. He is sooo Right Wing and is now trying to present a different face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. When Gorden stands next to Harry Reid at the podium and calls for a pullout I will believe him
Until then its all crap.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Smith has been anti-war for a while now. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. He is co-sponsor of the Levin-Reed bill to withdraw the troops before next spring.
First step taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Votes count all the rest is bullshit.
He says this is insane and then votes to support it. Typical Republican, all hat and no cattle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pwb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. All the smart people left Iraq
How can you form a government out of the uneducated population.???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. How convenient that these GOP Senators that are coming out against the war
are, for the most part, up for reelection next year. You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. No. Bush is insane. The war is a product of his insanity. nt
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 09:04 AM by cassiepriam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. Although he is doing this political reasons .... the end result will stop the war
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 09:10 AM by Botany
The #s are turning against bush big time ...

Snow
Hagel
Warner
Vonivich
Luger
and now Smith

And very soon
Collins
Specter
Coleman
will flip.

With Tim Johnson coming back and counting Lieberman in the bush camp
we are closing in on 60 and getting the hell out.

Time to get the 60 votes .... no matter where they come from.

Republicans up in 08.

Alexander, Lamar

Allard, Wayne

Chambliss, Saxby

Cochran, Thad

Coleman, Norm

Collins, Susan

Cornyn, John

Craig, Larry

Dole, Elizabeth

Domenici, Pete

Enzi, Michael

Graham, Lindsey

Hagel, Chuck

Inhofe, James

McConnell, Mitch

Roberts, Pat

Sessions, Jeff

Smith, Gordon

Stevens, Ted

Sununu, John

Warner, John

**********************

Sununu & Domenici are weak in their support of the war too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Domenici was just on NPR dancing and singing about needing a new plan in Iraq.
He was breathtakingly nonspecific and nearly aphasic on the subject, except for stressing his own separation from supporting the war. I assumed he's up for re-election, and sure nuff there he is.

And Inhofe too. My my. Fancy that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
11. I read a George Will article on Smith--
his opposition to the war is genuine. I'll defend the guy--his votes match his rhetoric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nancyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I think this is genuine.
As an Oregonian who has watched Gordon Smith for years, I tend to trust this is truly the way he feels. I have seen a distinct alteration of his hard-lined notions since the death of his son a few years ago. Perhaps a dose of reality shocked him into looking at the world differently. I will give him the benefit of the doubt here. I would never vote for the man, but I think he has had an eye-opening about the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. I don't buy it for a second
Smith is trying to polish his "moderate" credentials in the last year of his term after five years of faithful Bush backing. Unfortunately, the "name" Democratic players (Blumenauer and DeFazio) have opted not to challenge the Pond Killer, but Smith's in trouble just the same with Oregon voters. Hence his sudden, "strong" opposition to the war in Iraq.

But keep an eye on what he actually does and how he actually votes. It's unlikely in the extreme that should a cloture vote on any Senate bill or resolution come down to Smith's vote, that he would vote to go ahead and bring the bill to a full Senate vote. If cloture is a foregone conclusion (one way or the other), then and only then will he vote for it. And if a bill actually makes it to a vote, he'll be perfectly comfortable to let the perfect be the enemy of the good, and find some reason or another why it's not the perfect bill, and vote against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
14. "Criminally insane" works for me.
:shrug:

Lock 'em up in a padded cell for the rest of their psychopathic lives.

Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld, Rice, Rove, Libby, Hadley, Feith, Wolfowitz, Tenet, Bolton, et. al. infinitum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC