Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's Bloodthirsty Republicans Scrambling to Block Bipartisan Iraq Resolution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 12:12 PM
Original message
Bush's Bloodthirsty Republicans Scrambling to Block Bipartisan Iraq Resolution
February 4, 2007


Bush and McCain Mistake Cheerleading the Sacrifices They're Demanding of Our Soldiers for Support


"To plunder, butcher, steal, these things they misname empire: they make a desolation and they call it peace." --Tacitus

Republicans in the Senate will reportedly try to block the Democrats' non-binding resolution rebuking Bush on his ongoing escalation of his Iraq occupation. The Republican leadership is looking for a way to filibuster the vote on the resolution by Sen. John Warner, R-Va., Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mi., and others. The minority in the Senate expects that their two alternate Republican proposals will get an equal vote alongside the bipartisan one, and that each would require 60 votes to pass.

Republican presidential candidate John McCain, on ABC's 'This Week', called the bipartisan resolution "a vote of no confidence in both the mission and the troops." His own zeal in advocating for a way for even more of our soldiers to remain bogged down in Iraq has reduced the Senator to using demagoguery and desperate appeals to the basest of our emotions as he joins his president in elevating himself above the rest of us in his supposed concern for the "morale" of the troops they've decided should be targets for anyone who would "fight them there." These contemptuous, haters-of-democracy will turn their backs on the verdict of the last election and continue their manufactured state of war in Iraq behind the sacrifices of our nation's defenders.

McCain and others who insist on allowing Bush to continue to dump our soldiers into the middle of Iraq's civil war have mistaken their cheerleading of Bush's bloody fiasco for support for the soldiers they've abandoned there for four years without a sound mission or adequate resources to keep themselves alive while they've waited for one. McCain thinks it's perfectly fine to send thousands more soldiers than Bush has already committed in his escalation to fight and die against the very Iraqis he thinks he's liberating. McCain has conjured up a fantasy where our troops' morale grows each time their tour of duty in Iraq is extended; an imaginary world where our soldiers swell with gratitude each time their leave is shortened, and every time they're called back for another unprecedented repeat deployment.

His president, Bush, is lost in his own self-validating game of world monopoly with the bulk of our soldiers and our nation's defense resources piled on the Iraq space he imagines he bought with our tax trillions that he dishes out like play money. Like McCain, Bush is content to direct our troops around in Iraq like toy soldiers; both as delinquent as the "enemies" and "extremists" who they've sidled our nation alongside as just another miscreant carpetbagger; each vagabond gang looking to exploit and rape Iraq for their own greed, power, and influence. There's plenty of nobility in McCain and Bush's eyes for the soldiers and others they continue to sacrifice in Iraq as their own personal mercenaries in their unending "ideological 'war on terror" they've "decided" to stage there.

There's everything in Iraq to suit Bush and McCain's obsession with empire-building and conquest for the rest of Bush's term and into McCain's imagined one. Iraq has just enough of an increasing rate of individuals who have been compelled to resistant attacks against our forces and against the U.S. junta -- complimented by a never-ending state of chaos and violence -- to satisfy Bush and McCain's self-validating need to posture behind the sacrifices of our soldiers.

"I do believe that if you really believe that this is doomed to failure and is going to cost American lives, then you should do what's necessary to prevent it from happening rather than a vote of 'disapproval,'" McCain said Sunday.

That's what 'bring them home' means, Senator: Get our soldiers out of harm's way, not commit even more. That's what voters demanded in November when they removed Bush's legislative majority in Congress. Our Democratic majority has every cause to turn their backs on McCain and the other Republicans, who, themselves, have turned their backs on the American people's determination to end Bush's occupation.

Democratic leaders can do that by refusing to give any elevated platform to any legislative notion to continue Bush's Iraq fiasco. Americans shouldn't have to waste time with any status quo resolution from Republicans, or anyone else declaring their intention to continue to ignore the will of the people.


http://journals.democraticunderground.com/bigtree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. When we are still loosing 100's of soldiers a month in Iraq in November 2008...
America will remember they blocked any voice against the regime. If America doesn't remember it will be our duty to remind them again and again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Leader Reid on the Senate Floor
The war in Iraq has taken a great toll on our soldiers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. its not blood they thirst for, its power. they wont turn their backs on bush
no matter how many horrors he commits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. they'll start to fear for their jobs by summer.
with the 2008 campaign already underway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Homer12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let the Thugs block it.
Edited on Mon Feb-05-07 12:40 PM by Homer12
It just draws attetention to themsevles and their pro-war values.

It further isolates the them from the rethugs and conservatives whom want to get out of Iraq for whatever reasons they have.

The block also exposes these thugs to the media and to the backlash of public opinion, the blockers become the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. hard to argue about the need for a resolution if we just "let" them block one
especially this one. The game is to peel off republicans with some Bush-affirming resolution and avoid what will be a gigantic rebuke of a president who imagines himself at war if the bipartisan one passes. If it fails, it won't make it any easier for the binding ones which legislators have said will follow, and, our soldiers can't afford to wait for an impeachment or the next president for these people to begin to end the occupation and bring them home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. ON THE SENATE FLOOR: 2:00 pm
U.S. Troops Levels in Iraq

On Monday, watch C-SPAN2 LIVE for debate on the U.S. Policy in Iraq and resolutions relating to Pres. Bush’s new plan to increase troop levels. Sen. John Warner (R-VA) introduced a compromise Iraq War resolution which has became the center of debate on the issue.

http://www.c-span.org/watch/index.asp?Cat=TV&Code=CS

http://www.c-span.org/watch/cs_cspan2_rm.asp?Cat=TV&Code=CS2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. GOP will fillibuster a resolution 70% of the U.S. agrees with, Dems were afraid to fillibuster Alito
No wonder we are so fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It comes down to their leadership and ours
I guarantee that committees, pork, leadership positions and possibly dirty laundry were used by the Repugs to bring their sheep in line.
The Democrats, on the other hand, are still letting BlowJoe have a leadership position regardless of the rhetoric he spews.
That's the difference in a nutshell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. most of the committees are in veteran hands
the 'leadership' is made up of good folks. I just don't see any need to take swipe at them for their efforts so far
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. link to final (edited) version
February 5, 2007 at 09:16:00

Bush's Bloodthirsty Republicans Scrambling to Block Bipartisan Iraq Resolution

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_ron_full_070205_bush_s_bloodthirsty_.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC