Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conyers To Cheney Re: Libby - "There Was A CLOUD Over Certain Aspects Of Your Conduct"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 07:19 AM
Original message
Conyers To Cheney Re: Libby - "There Was A CLOUD Over Certain Aspects Of Your Conduct"
Edited on Sun Jun-10-07 07:28 AM by kpete
Conyers & Nadler Have Written A Letter To VP Telling Him To Stay Clear Of Any Further Discussions Regarding Libby & Warn Him That They Know His Hands Are Dirty

...........................

...at the trial evidence was elicited of your involvement with Mr. Libby in connection with the events that formed the basis of his prosecution. As the Federal Prosecutor stated in his closing argument, the evidence at trial revealed that there was "a cloud" over certain aspects of your conduct. Accordingly, your comments may be seen as blurring the distinction between the institutional interests of the Office of Vice President and your personal interests in the ultimate results of the prosecution.

...your comments would appear particularly inappropriate because post-trial proceedings are ongoing....The Executive Branch must speak through one voice on matters of criminal prosecution...

We would hope that a sitting Vice President would not suggest that the Government seeks any result other than that sought by the prosecutors representing the Department of Justice, or imply that the decisions of the trial court - both as to the validity of the verdict or the proper sentence- should be undone.


Thus, in light of your personal involvment in the facts that gave rise to the charges against Mr. Libby, and your apparent stake in a favorable outcome for him, we strongly urge that you recuse yourself from any further involvement -direct or indirect, official or unofficial, in any future issues that relate to his prosecution. It would be deeply divisive, and invite deep cynicism and disrespect for the legal process, were the American people to conclude that Mr. Libby undertook actions that subjected him to criminal liability to protect you knowing or believing, or having the facts ultimately reveal, that you would thereafter take steps to protect him from the consequesnces of his criminal conduct.
http://judiciary.house.gov/Media/PDFS/Conyers-Nadler070607.pdf

Cheney's Letter
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/06/20070605-12.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. "I remain deeply saddened by this tragedy...."
...and 80% of the public remains deeply saddened that you are not behind bars, shoots-guy-in-face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. I hope the old fart
blows a gasket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks John Conyers
Expose these criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Congress to Cheney: Mr. VP, we need to have a "criminal conduct" conversation.
Goes to impeachment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. letter-writing is for the minority
now that we have subpoena power, let's step things up a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well, John, I hope you schedule hearings on Kicinich's Bill RSN
Real Soon Now.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Please help, anyone with incisive knowledge of the subject, in the
Edited on Sun Jun-10-07 12:04 PM by EST
"statesmanship" part of my continuing political education-

Does "We would hope" and other, similar understatement actually mean, "We have your number and this had better happen right friggin' now or you're up to your moundy roundies in deeeep kim chee?"

Inquiring neophyte type minds really want to know.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Coming from Conyers, I assume this is an opening salvo.He's been amassing evidence for years...
John Conyers has been soldiering on during these past vile years, trying to establish the truth, trying to hold hearings even when the Publicans practically consigned him to a broom closet.

I'm not knowledgable in the ways of the Congress, but I have confidence in John Conyers. I hope someone else can shed more light on the matter.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. Written him a letter?
This is all WAY beyond just writing letters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC